In defence of Paul Feyerabend
Inquiry 17 (1-4):112 (1974)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,653 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesRobert P. Farrell (2000). Will the Popperian Feyerabend Please Step Forward: Pluralistic, Popperian Themes in the Philosophy of Paul Feyerabend. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 14 (3):257 – 266.
Sarah M. Roe (2009). The Attenuated Ramblings of a Madman. Polish Journal of Philosophy 3 (2):67-85.
Jonathan Y. Tsou (2003). Reconsidering Feyerabend's 'Anarchism'. Perspectives on Science 11 (2):208-235.
Harvey Siegel (1989). Farewell to Feyerabend. Inquiry 32 (3):343 – 369.
Paul Feyerabend (1970). In Defence of Classical Physics. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 1 (1):59-85.
Paul Feyerabend, John Preston, Gonzalo Munévar & David Lamb (eds.) (2000). The Worst Enemy of Science?: Essays in Memory of Paul Feyerabend. Oxford University Press.
Paul Hoyningen-Huene (2002). Paul Feyerabend Und Thomas Kuhn. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 33 (1):61-83.
John Kadvany (1996). Reason in History: Paul Feyerabend's Autobiography. Inquiry 39 (1):141 – 146.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-03-05Total downloads17 ( #70,994 of 548,984 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,327 of 548,984 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
