Graduate studies at Western
Angelaki 15 (2):129-147 (2010)
|Abstract||Explications of the reconstruction of Leibniz’s metaphysics that Deleuze undertakes in 'The Fold: Leibniz and the Baroque' focus predominantly on the role of the infinitesimal calculus developed by Leibniz.1 While not underestimat- ing the importance of the infinitesimal calculus and the law of continuity as reflected in the calculus of infinite series to any understanding of Leibniz’s metaphysics and to Deleuze’s reconstruction of it in The Fold, what I propose to examine in this paper is the role played by other developments in mathematics that Deleuze draws upon, including those made by a number of Leibniz’s near contemporaries – the projective geometry that has its roots in the work of Desargues (1591–1661) and the ‘proto-topology’ that appears in the work of Du ̈rer (1471–1528) – and a number of the subsequent developments in these fields of mathematics. Deleuze brings this elaborate conjunction of material together in order to set up a mathematical idealization of the system that he considers to be implicit in Leibniz’s work. The result is a thoroughly mathematical explication of the structure of Leibniz’s metaphysics. What is provided in this paper is an exposition of the very mathematical underpinnings of this Deleuzian account of the structure of Leibniz’s metaphysics, which, I maintain, subtends the entire text of The Fold.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Simon B. Duffy (2012). The Question of Deleuze’s Neo-Leibnizianism. In Patricia Pisters, Rosi Braidotti & Alan D. Schrift (eds.), Down by Law: Revisiting Normativity with Deleuze. Bloomsbury.
Keith Robinson (2003). Events of Difference. Epoché 8 (1):141-164.
Simon Duffy (2010). Leibniz, Mathematics and the Monad. In Sjoerd van Tuinen & Niamh McDonnell (eds.), Deleuze and the Fold: A Critical Reader. Palgrave Macmillan.
Arkady Plotnitsky (2003). Algebras, Geometries, and Topologies of the Fold : Deleuze, Derrida, and Quasi-Mathematical Thinking (with Leibniz and Mallarmé). In Paul Patton & John Protevi (eds.), Between Deleuze and Derrida. Continuum.
Mogens Lærke (2010). Four Things Deleuze Learned From Leibniz. In Sjoerd van Tuinen & Niamh McDonnell (eds.), Deleuze and the Fold: A Critical Reader. Palgrave Macmillan.
Niamh McDonnell (2010). Leibniz's Combinatorial Art of Synthesis and the Temporal Interval of the Fold. In Sjoerd van Tuinen & Niamh McDonnell (eds.), Deleuze and the Fold: A Critical Reader. Palgrave Macmillan.
Daniel W. Smith (2010). Genesis and Difference: Deleuze, Maimon, and the Post-Kantian Reading of Leibniz. In Sjoerd van Tuinen & Niamh McDonnell (eds.), Deleuze and the Fold: A Critical Reader. Palgrave Macmillan.
Sjoerd van Tuinen (2010). Transcendental Philosophy of the Event: Deleuze's Non-Phenomenological Reading of Leibniz. In Sjoerd van Tuinen & Niamh McDonnell (eds.), Deleuze and the Fold: A Critical Reader. Palgrave Macmillan.
Simon B. Duffy (2004). Schizo-Math: The Logic of Different/Ciation and the Philosophy of Difference. Angelaki 9 (3):199 – 215.
Simon B. Duffy (2009). The Role of Mathematics in Deleuze's Critical Engagement with Hegel. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 17 (4):563 – 582.
Harry G. Frankfurt (1976). Leibniz: A Collection of Critical Essays. University of Notre Dame Press.
Harry G. Frankfurt (1972). Leibniz. Garden City, N.Y.,Anchor Books.
Simon B. Duffy (2006). The Differential Point of View of the Infinitesimal Calculus in Spinoza, Leibniz and Deleuze. Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 37 (3):286-307.
Sjoerd Van Tuinen (2011). Michelangelo, Leibniz and the Serpentine Figure. Deleuze Studies 5 (1):63-72.
Added to index2010-10-15
Total downloads75 ( #13,481 of 752,087 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,000 of 752,087 )
How can I increase my downloads?