Graduate studies at Western
Philosophy Compass 4 (6):978-986 (2009)
|Abstract||The paper begins with the plausible view that criminal responsibility should track moral responsibility, and explains its plausibility. A necessary distinction is then drawn between liability and answerability as two dimensions of responsibility, and is shown to underpin the distinction in criminal law between offences and defences. This enables us to distinguish strict liability from strict answerability, and to see that whilst strict criminal liability seems inconsistent with the principle that criminal responsibility should track moral responsibility, strict criminal answerability is not. We must ask, therefore, whether, when and why strict criminal responsibility is unacceptable.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
David W. Shoemaker (2011). Psychopathy, Responsibility, and the Moral/Conventional Distinction. Southern Journal of Philosophy 49 (s1):99-124.
John Gardner (2007). Offences and Defences: Selected Essays in the Philosophy of Criminal Law. Oxford University Press.
Victor Tadros (2007). Criminal Responsibility. OUP Oxford.
Antony Duff (2007). Answering for Crime: Responsibility and Liability in the Criminal Law. Hart Pub..
R. A. Duff (2009). Strict Responsibility, Moral and Criminal. Journal of Value Inquiry 43 (3):295-313.
R. A. Duff (2008). Responsibility and Liability in Criminal Law. In Matthew H. Kramer (ed.), The Legacy of H.L.A. Hart: Legal, Political, and Moral Philosophy. Oxford University Press.
Nicole A. Vincent (2010). On the Relevance of Neuroscience to Criminal Responsibility. Criminal Law and Philosophy 4 (1):77-98.
Roger A. Shiner & Jeremy Hoemsen (2006). A. P. Simester (Ed): Appraising Strict Liability. Criminal Law and Philosophy 1 (1):119-122.
Added to index2009-11-26
Total downloads157 ( #3,094 of 756,890 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #21,281 of 756,890 )
How can I increase my downloads?