David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy Compass 4 (6):978-986 (2009)
The paper begins with the plausible view that criminal responsibility should track moral responsibility, and explains its plausibility. A necessary distinction is then drawn between liability and answerability as two dimensions of responsibility, and is shown to underpin the distinction in criminal law between offences and defences. This enables us to distinguish strict liability from strict answerability, and to see that whilst strict criminal liability seems inconsistent with the principle that criminal responsibility should track moral responsibility, strict criminal answerability is not. We must ask, therefore, whether, when and why strict criminal responsibility is unacceptable.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
John Martin Fischer & Mark Ravizza (1998). Responsibility and Control: A Theory of Moral Responsibility. Cambridge University Press.
Aristotle (2012). Nicomachean Ethics. Courier Dover Publications.
R. Jay Wallace (1996). Responsibility and the Moral Sentiments. Harvard University Press.
Aristotle (1998). Nicomachean Ethics. Dover Publications.
Gary Watson (2004). Agency and Answerability: Selected Essays. Oxford University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
Luís Duarte D'Almeida (2012). 'O Call Me Not to Justify the Wrong': Criminal Answerability and the Offence/Defence Distinction. [REVIEW] Criminal Law and Philosophy 6 (2):227-245.
Luís Duarte D'Almeida (2012). 'O Call Me Not to Justify the Wrong': Criminal Answerability and the Offence/Defence Distinction. Criminal Law and Philosophy 6 (2):227-245.
Similar books and articles
David W. Shoemaker (2011). Psychopathy, Responsibility, and the Moral/Conventional Distinction. Southern Journal of Philosophy 49 (s1):99-124.
John Gardner (2007). Offences and Defences: Selected Essays in the Philosophy of Criminal Law. Oxford University Press.
Victor Tadros (2007). Criminal Responsibility. OUP Oxford.
Antony Duff (2007). Answering for Crime: Responsibility and Liability in the Criminal Law. Hart Pub..
R. A. Duff (2009). Strict Responsibility, Moral and Criminal. Journal of Value Inquiry 43 (3):295-313.
R. A. Duff (2008). Responsibility and Liability in Criminal Law. In Matthew H. Kramer (ed.), The Legacy of H.L.A. Hart: Legal, Political, and Moral Philosophy. Oxford University Press
Nicole A. Vincent (2010). On the Relevance of Neuroscience to Criminal Responsibility. Criminal Law and Philosophy 4 (1):77-98.
Roger A. Shiner & Jeremy Hoemsen (2006). A. P. Simester (Ed): Appraising Strict Liability. Criminal Law and Philosophy 1 (1):119-122.
Added to index2009-11-26
Total downloads207 ( #8,421 of 1,726,249 )
Recent downloads (6 months)15 ( #48,707 of 1,726,249 )
How can I increase my downloads?