David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 84 (1):1-28 (2010)
After an initial discussion (§i) of what a theory of criminal law might amount to, I sketch (§ii) the proper aims of a liberal, republican criminal law, and discuss (§§iii–iv) two central features of such a criminal law: that it deals with public wrongs, and provides for those who perpetrate such wrongs to be called to public account. §v explains why a liberal republic should maintain such a system of criminal law, and §vi tackles the issue of criminalization—of how we should determine the proper scope of the criminal law
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Peter Alldridge (1990). Rules for Courts and Rules for Citizens. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 10 (4):487-504.
Colin Bird (2007). Harm Versus Sovereignty: A Reply to Ripstein. Philosophy and Public Affairs 35 (2):179–194.
G. Cohen (2006). Casting the First Stone: Who Can, and Who Can't, Condemn the Terrorists? Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 81 (58):113-.
Meir Dan-Cohen (2002). Harmful Thoughts: Essays on Law, Self, and Morality. Princeton University Press.
Michelle Madden Dempsey & Jonathan Herring (2007). Why Sexual Penetration Requires Justification. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 27 (3):467-491.
Citations of this work BETA
Alfonso Donoso (forthcoming). Commentaries on Criminal Law Conversations. Criminal Law and Philosophy:1-13.
Emmanuel Melissaris (2012). Property Offences as Crimes of Injustice. Criminal Law and Philosophy 6 (2):149-166.
Nina Peršak (2014). Criminal Law, the Victim and Community: The Shades of 'We' and the Conceptual Involvement of Community in Contemporary Criminal Law Theory. [REVIEW] Criminal Law and Philosophy 8 (1):205-215.
Similar books and articles
Stephen Shute, John Gardner & Jeremy Horder (eds.) (1993). Action and Value in Criminal Law. Oxford University Press.
Michael S. Moore (1993). Act and Crime: The Philosophy of Action and its Implications for Criminal Law. Oxford University Press.
David Dolinko (2012). Review of “Crime and Culpability: A Theory of Criminal Law”. [REVIEW] Criminal Law and Philosophy 6 (1):93-102.
George P. Fletcher (2007). The Grammar of Criminal Law: American, Comparative, and International. Oxford University Press.
R. A. Duff (2010). Blame, Moral Standing and the Legitimacy of the Criminal Trial. Ratio 23 (2):123-140.
Antony Duff (ed.) (1998). Philosophy and the Criminal Law: Principle and Critique. Cambridge University Press.
François Tanguay-Renaud (2012). Individual Emergencies and the Rule of Criminal Law. In François Tanguay-Renaud & James Stribopoulos (eds.), Rethinking Criminal Law Theory: New Canadian Perspectives in the Philosophy of Domestic, Transnational, and International Criminal Law. Hart Publishing.
Douglas Husak (2008). Why Criminal Law: A Question of Content? [REVIEW] Criminal Law and Philosophy 2 (2):99-122.
Antony Duff & Stuart P. Green (eds.) (2011). Philosophical Foundations of Criminal Law. Oxford University Press.
Added to index2010-05-27
Total downloads100 ( #13,864 of 1,413,409 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #51,624 of 1,413,409 )
How can I increase my downloads?