The difference between science and philosophy: the Spinoza-Boyle controversy revisited
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Paragraph 29 (2):115-138 (2006)
This article examines the seventeenth-century debate between the Dutch philosopher Benedict de Spinoza and the British scientist Robert Boyle, with a view to explicating what the twentieth-century French philosopher Gilles Deleuze considers to be the difference between science and philosophy. The two main themes that are usually drawn from the correspondence of Boyle and Spinoza, and used to polarize the exchange, are the different views on scientific methodology and on the nature of matter that are attributed to each correspondent. Commentators have tended to focus on one or the other of these themes in order to champion either Boyle or Spinoza in their assessment of the exchange. This paper draws upon the resources made available by Gilles Deleuze and Felix Guattari in their major work What is Philosophy?, in order to offer a more balanced account of the exchange, which in its turn contributes to our understanding of Deleuze and Guattari’s conception of the difference between science and philosophy.
|Keywords||Spinoza Boyle Deleuze|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Simon B. Duffy (2004). The Logic of Expression in Deleuze's Expressionism in Philosophy: Spinoza: A Strategy of Engagement. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 12 (1):47 – 60.
Simon B. Duffy (2006). The Logic of Expression: Quality, Quantity and Intensity in Spinoza, Hegel and Deleuze. Ashgate.
Simon B. Duffy (2006). The Differential Point of View of the Infinitesimal Calculus in Spinoza, Leibniz and Deleuze. Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 37 (3):286-307.
Philip Turetzky (2009). The Logic of Expression: Quality, Quantity and Intensity in Spinoza, Hegel and Deleuze, by Simon Duffy. European Journal of Philosophy 17 (2):341-345.
Filip A. A. Buyse (2010). Spinoza and Robert Boyle's Definition of Mechanical Philosophy. Historia Philosophica 8:73-89.
Jonathan Beever & Vernon Cisney (2013). All Things in Mind: Panpsychist Elements in Spinoza, Deleuze, and Peirce. [REVIEW] Biosemiotics 6 (3):351-365.
Thomas Nail (2008). Expression, Immanence and Constructivism: 'Spinozism' and Gilles Deleuze. Deleuze Studies 2 (2):201-219.
J. J. MacIntosh (1992). Robert Boyle's Epistemology: The Interaction Between Scientific and Religious Knowledge. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 6 (2):91 – 121.
A. Pyle (2002). Boyle on Science and the Mechanical Philosophy: A Reply to Chalmers. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 33 (1):171-186.
Mathias Schönher (2013). The Creation of the Concept Through the Interaction of Philosophy with Science and Art. Deleuze Studies 7 (1):26-52.
David R. Cole (2011). The Actions of Affect in Deleuze: Others Using Language and the Language That We Make .. Educational Philosophy and Theory 43 (6):549-561.
Simon B. Duffy (2008). Review of Michael Hunter, The Boyle Papers: Understanding the Manuscripts of Robert Boyle (Ashgate, 2007). [REVIEW] Reviews in the Enlightenment 1.
Filip Buyse (2013). Spinoza, Boyle, Galileo : Was Spinoza a Strict Mechanical Philosopher? Intellectual History Review 23 (1):45-64.
R. P. (2002). Boyle on Seminal Principles. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 33 (4):597-630.
Added to index2010-11-09
Total downloads52 ( #79,355 of 1,792,217 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #464,595 of 1,792,217 )
How can I increase my downloads?