|Abstract||On the basis of a communicative theory of criminal punishment, I show how mercy has a significant but limited role to play in the criminal law—in particular (although not only) in criminal sentencing. Mercy involves an intrusion into the realm of criminal law of values and concerns that are not themselves part of the perspective of criminal law: a merciful sentencer acts beyond the limits of her legal role, on the basis of moral considerations that conflict with the demands of penal justice. Sometimes, however (but in a decent system of law in a decent society, rarely), that is how citizens should act. Finally, I discuss, and criticise, two attempts to find a place for mercy within a communicative conception of punishment, and argue that repentance is not an appropriate ground for leniency or mercy in sentencing|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
John Tasioulas (2003). Mercy. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 103 (2):101–132.
M. Sigler (2000). The Story of Justice:Retribution, Mercy, and the Role of Emotions in the Capital Sentencing Process. Law and Philosophy 19 (3):339-367.
Stephen Kershnar (2000). Mercy, Retributivism, and Harsh Punishment. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 14 (2):209-224.
Ned Markosian (2013). Two Puzzles About Mercy. Philosophical Quarterly 63 (251):269-292.
Shawn Floyd (2009). Aquinas and the Obligations of Mercy. Journal of Religious Ethics 37 (3):449-471.
Paulo D. Barrozo (2007). Punishing Cruelly: Punishment, Cruelty, and Mercy. Criminal Law and Philosophy 2 (1):67-84.
John Deigh & David Dolinko (eds.) (2011). The Oxford Handbook of the Philosophy of the Criminal Law. Oxford University Press.
R. A. Duff (1990). Review Essay / Justice, Mercy, and Forgiveness. Criminal Justice Ethics 9 (2):51-63.
R. A. Duff (2011). Mercy. In John Deigh & David Dolinko (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the Philosophy of the Criminal Law. Oxford University Press.
A. E. (1999). The Irrationality of Merciful Legal Judgement: Exclusionary Reasoning and the Question of the Particular. Law and Philosophy 18 (3):215-241.
Emilios A. Christodoulidis (1999). The Irrationality of Merciful Legal Judgement: Exclusionary Reasoning and the Question of the Particular. Law and Philosophy 18 (3):215 - 241.
Antony Duff (2003). Punishment, Communication and Community. In Derek Matravers & Jonathan E. Pike (eds.), Debates in Contemporary Political Philosophy: An Anthology. Routledge, in Association with the Open University.
Carla Ann Hage Johnson (1991). Entitled to Clemency: Mercy in the Criminal Law. Law and Philosophy 10 (1):109 - 118.
Carla Ann Hage Johnson (1991). Entitled to Clemency: Mercy in the Criminal Law. Law and Philosophy 10 (1):109-118.
Chelsea Pietsch (2010). What Is Mercy?: Reflections on the True Nature of Mercy in the Context of Euthanasia. Bioethics Research Notes 22 (1):3.
Added to index2011-10-25
Total downloads9 ( #113,941 of 548,984 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,320 of 548,984 )
How can I increase my downloads?