David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 18 (4):319-343 (2005)
In regulatory practice, the principle of precaution is hardly linked to the ideal of sustainable development. In this article, we argue that it should be. We argue that sustainable development is the sense of an ethics of co-responsibility, while precaution is the attitude needed to realize this sense. From this perspective, we comment on some regulatory practices within the European context regarding authorization requests for deliberate releases of genetically modified crops and show some problems that are popping up there, for example, the difficulties in interpreting the meaning of harm” (and of benefit”), the symptomatic gap between regulatory rule and political practice. Finally, we suggest that, in order to respond to such problems, precaution should find an appropriate translation in the fields of both research and innovation policy, of authorization policy and of economic policy.
|Keywords||Co-responsibility precaution public policy sustainable development|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Maria Olson (2012). The European 'We': From Citizenship Policy to the Role of Education. Studies in Philosophy and Education 31 (1):77-89.
Anne Ingeborg Myhr & Terje Traavik (2002). The Precautionary Principle: Scientific Uncertainty and Omitted Research in the Context of GMO Use and Release. [REVIEW] Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 15 (1):73-86.
L. B. Meijboom Franck, Elsbeth Nina Cohen, Frans N. Stassen & W. A. Brom (2009). Beyond the Prevention of Harm: Animal Disease Policy as a Moral Question. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 22 (6).
Anton Petrenko & Dan McArthur (2010). Between Same-Sex Marriages and the Large Hadron Collider : Making Sense of the Precautionary Principle. [REVIEW] Science and Engineering Ethics 16 (3):591-610.
Ronald Bailey (2001). Deciding About Your Health Care: The Ethicist as Policy-Maker. [REVIEW] Health Care Analysis 9 (3):265-281.
Sven Ove Hansson (1997). The Limits of Precaution. Foundations of Science 2 (2):293-306.
Anne Ingeborg Myhr (2010). A Precautionary Approach to Genetically Modified Organisms: Challenges and Implications for Policy and Science. [REVIEW] Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 23 (6):501-525.
Celina Ramjoué (2007). The Transatlantic Rift in Genetically Modified Food Policy. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 20 (5):419-436.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads2 ( #337,655 of 1,096,955 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #273,368 of 1,096,955 )
How can I increase my downloads?