Graduate studies at Western
Inquiry 24 (4):439 – 448 (1981)
|Abstract||The short fragment of Frege's Nachlass which bears the above title, given to it by the editors, is in fact a sequence of connected comments by him on the Introduction to Lotze's Logik, or, more exactly, a response by him to that Introduction. It is thus very probably the earliest piece of writing from Frege's pen on the philosophy of logic surviving to us, and, when it is read in this light, the motivation for its author's puzzling selection of remarks and the turns of phrase he employs become intelligible. We see here an early attempt by Frege to attain clarity about a topic that was to preoccupy him throughout his entire philosophical career, the nature of thoughts.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Michael D. Resnik (1979). II. Frege as Idealist and Then Realist. Inquiry 22 (1-4):350-357.
Howard Wettstein (1990). Frege‐Russell Semantics? Dialectica 44 (1‐2):113-135.
Roger Schmit (1990). Gebrauchssprache Und Logik. Eine Philosophiehistorische Notiz Zu Frege Und Lotze. History and Philosophy of Logic 11 (1):5-17.
Hans D. Sluga (1977). Frege's Alleged Realism. Inquiry 20 (1-4):227 – 242.
Michael Dummett (1982). Objectivity and Reality in Lotze and Frege. Inquiry 25 (1):95 – 114.
Uwe Dathe (1995). Gottlob Frege Und Rudolf Eucken—Gesprächspartner in der Herausbildungsphase der Modernen Logik. History and Philosophy of Logic 16 (2):245-255.
Gregory Currie (1983). I. Interpreting Frege: A Reply to Michael Dummett. Inquiry 26 (3):345 – 359.
Frans Hovens (1997). Lotze and Frege: The Dating of the'Kernsätze'∗. History and Philosophy of Logic 18 (1):17-31.
Added to index2009-03-05
Total downloads13 ( #95,821 of 754,609 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,000 of 754,609 )
How can I increase my downloads?