David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 5:161-169 (2007)
On a general level, this paper proposes a critical analysis of one of the attempts to make bridges between economics and moral and political philosophy. A priori, we may expect that formal methods may lead to clearer and more rigorous arguments, and may facilitate practical applications. However, this paper illustrates how precision is bought at the price of becoming tautological. Therefore, the statement that "it is already widely recognized that formal methods derived from economics can contribute to ethics" (Broome 1989: ix) seems hasty. The paper is organized as follows: Section 2 discusses some philosophical background assumptions which underlie a decision theoretic argument in favour of utilitarianism. Section 3 recalls briefly John Harsanyi's decision theoretic arguments in favour of utilitarianism. It then focuses on the crucial assumption of separability in order to show that separability can always be saved as an assumption if one applies the strategy of dispersion. Section 4, finally, shows how the theorem may indeed reconcile the concern for equality and utilitarianism, at the price of becoming futile
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Geert Demuijnck (2007). More Formalism at the Price of Less Substance. On Broome’s Decision Theoretic Contribution to Utilitarianism. In Berna Kilinç, Gürol Irzik & Stephen Voss (eds.), Logic and Philosophy of Science. Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy.
Anthony Skelton (2011). Ideal Utilitarianism: Rashdall and Moore. In Thomas Hurka (ed.), Underivative Duty: British Moral Philosophers from Sidgwick to Ewing. Oxford University Press. 45-65.
John Broome (1999). Ethics Out of Economics. Cambridge University Press.
Gonzalo Rodriguez-Pereyra (2008). Descartes's Substance Dualism and His Independence Conception of Substance. Journal of the History of Philosophy 46 (1):69-89.
Matt Zwolinski (2008). The Ethics of Price Gouging. Business Ethics Quarterly 18 (3):347-378.
Nick Zangwill (2000). In Defence of Moderate Aesthetic Formalism. Philosophical Quarterly 50 (201):476-493.
John C. Harsanyi (1977). Rule Utilitarianism and Decision Theory. Erkenntnis 11 (1):25 - 53.
Tom Carson (1993). Hare on Utilitarianism and Intuitive Morality. Erkenntnis 39 (3):305-331.
Heikki Helanterä & Tobias Uller (2010). The Price Equation and Extended Inheritance. Philosophy and Theory in Biology 2 (20130604).
Jeremy Snyder (2009). What's the Matter with Price Gouging? Business Ethics Quarterly 19 (2):275-293.
Philippe Mongin (2001). The Impartial Observer Theorem of Social Ethics. Economics and Philosophy 17 (2):147-179.
Tom Carson (1993). Hare on Utilitarianism and Intuitive Morality. Erkenntnis 39 (3):305 - 331.
Anthony Skelton (2014). Utilitarianism, Welfare, Children. In Alexander Bagattini & Colin Macleod (eds.), The Nature of Children's Well-being: Theory and Practice. Springer. 85-103.
Francisco J. Vázquez & Richard Watt (2002). The Price of Risk with Incomplete Knowledge on the Utility Function. Theory and Decision 53 (3):271-287.
Added to index2011-12-02
Total downloads3 ( #294,221 of 1,101,564 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #178,496 of 1,101,564 )
How can I increase my downloads?