Graduate studies at Western
Journal of Philosophical Logic 9 (1):41 - 57 (1980)
|Abstract||The validity of an entailment has nothing to do with whether or not the components are true, false, necessary, or impossible; it has to do solely with whether or not there is a necessary connection between antecedent and consequent. Hence it is a mistake (we feel) to try to build a sieve which will “strain out” entailments from the set of material or strict “implications” present in some system of truth-functions, or of truth-functions with modality. Anderson and Belnap (1962, p. 47)|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Fabrice Correia (2004). Semantics for Analytic Containment. Studia Logica 77 (1):87 - 104.
Charlene Haddock Seigfried (1990). The Pragmatist Sieve of Concepts: Description Versus Interpretation. Journal of Philosophy 87 (11):585-592.
José M. Méndez (1990). Exhaustively Axiomatizing RMO with an Appropiate Extension of Anderson and Belnap's “Strong and Natural List of Valid Entailments”. Theoria 5 (1):223-228.
J. Michael Dunn (1976). Intuitive Semantics for First-Degree Entailments and 'Coupled Trees'. Philosophical Studies 29 (3):149-168.
Alan Ross Anderson & Nuel D. Belnap (1962). Tautological Entailments. Philosophical Studies 13 (1-2):9 - 24.
Janusz Czelakowski (1983). Some Theorems on Structural Entailment Relations. Studia Logica 42 (4):417 - 429.
J. Michael Dunn (2000). Partiality and its Dual. Studia Logica 66 (1):5-40.
Jeremy Butterfield & Chris Isham, A Topos Perspective on the Kochen-Specker Theorem: IV. Interval Valuations.
Ross T. Brady (1988). A Content Semantics for Quantified Relevant Logics. I. Studia Logica 47 (2):111 - 127.
Neil Tennant (1984). Perfect Validity, Entailment and Paraconsistency. Studia Logica 43 (1-2):181 - 200.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads7 ( #142,848 of 757,560 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,427 of 757,560 )
How can I increase my downloads?