Development aid: The moral obligation to innovation [Book Review]
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 4 (1):31-48 (1991)
The prominent, though not exclusive, role of basic needs strategies to attain ethically acceptable development goals raises the question of the ability of development agencies to find and employ basic needs strategies. The obligation to prevent severe human suffering leads to the obligation to employ basic needs strategies to attain basic needs goals. The history of failure by development agencies in finding and employing basic needs tools leads to a further obligation to cultivate bureaucratic environments which foster profound innovation. This requires not only new tools but also new bureaucratic behaviour. An understandable obstacle to simultaneously technological and bureaucratic innovation lies in the tension between responsible behaviour and behaviour promoting fundamental change. Since this tension is based on the unpredictability of creative change, a series of axioms and corollaries which reduce the unpredictability is given. They include: (1) an obligation to seek innovation; (2) a clear statement of basic needs goals and intent to use some basic needs tools; (3) increase in effective knowledge of the poor and their survival strategies; (4) bureaucratic learning flexibility; (5) participatory development and allied emphasis on sustainable resource technologies. The embodiment of these in the learning process approach is illustrated.
|Keywords||innovation basic needs development failure learning process approach bureaucratic reorientation|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Richard W. Wilson (1978). A New Direction for the Study of Moral Behaviour. Journal of Moral Education 7 (2):122-131.
Wendy Ann Adams (2008). A Transdisciplinary Ontology of Innovation Governance. Artificial Intelligence and Law 16 (2):147-174.
Jürgen Oelkers (1994). Influence and Development: Two Basic Paradigms of Education. [REVIEW] Studies in Philosophy and Education 13 (2):91-109.
Don E. Marietta Jr (1982). Knowledge and Obligation in Environmental Ethics: A Phenomenological Approach. Environmental Ethics 4 (2):153-162.
Darryl Reed (2002). Corporate Governance Reforms in Developing Countries. Journal of Business Ethics 37 (3):223 - 247.
Stephen Darwall (2010). Moral Obligation: Form and Substance. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 110 (1):31-46.
Martin Carrier (2010). Theories for Use: On the Bearing of Basic Science on Practical Problems. In. In M. Dorato M. Suàrez (ed.), Epsa Epistemology and Methodology of Science. Springer. 23--33.
Davide Mate, Alberto Carpaneto, Corrado Tirassa, Adelina Brizio, Raffaele Rezzonico, Barbara Brassesco, Fabio Surra, Daniela Rabellino & Maurizio Tirassa, Opening the Black Box: How Staff Training and Development May Affect the Innovation of Enterprises.
Markus F. Peschl & Thomas Fundneider, Emergent Innovation—a Socio-Epistemological Innovation Technology. Creating Profound Change and Radically New Knowledge as Core Challenges in Knowledge Management.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads8 ( #168,674 of 1,099,003 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #287,293 of 1,099,003 )
How can I increase my downloads?