David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 3 (3):179-185 (2006)
The challenge for those responsible for funding, brokering and assessing the merit of proposed Indigenous research is to identify and then work co-operatively with appropriate representatives of Indigenous interests in order to increase the flow of benefits from research to Indigenous peoples. Experience in Australia has shown that this is not a straightforward process. In this paper we indicate some reasons why it is important for the research community to broker research with representative Indigenous organisations and to involve Indigenous peoples in the ethical assessment and conduct of research. We then identify some barriers to the achievement of these objectives and outline recently developed interventions from the field of health research that aim to promote a more effective working relationship between Indigenous peoples and members of the research community.
|Keywords||Ethics Research Indigenous populations Australia|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Lynn Gillam & Priscilla Pyett (2003). A Commentary on the NH&MRC Draft Values and Ethics in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health Research. Monash Bioethics Review 22 (4):8-19.
Jane McKendrick & Pamela Aratukutuku Bennett (2003). The Ethics of Health Research and Indigenous Peoples [Reply to Gillam, Lynn and Pyett, Priscilla. A Commentary on the NH and MRC Draft Values and Ethics in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health Research.]. Monash Bioethics Review 22 (4):20.
G. Garvey (2004). Is There an Aboriginal Bioethic? Journal of Medical Ethics 30 (6):570-575.
Lynn Gillam (2000). The New National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Research Involving Humans: A Commentary. Monash Bioethics Review 19 (1).
Citations of this work BETA
Jennifer A. Knight, Elizabeth J. Comino, Elizabeth Harris & Lisa Jackson-Pulver (2009). Indigenous Research: A Commitment to Walking the Talk. The Gudaga Study—an Australian Case Study. [REVIEW] Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 6 (4):467-476.
Similar books and articles
Roy W. Perrett (1998). Indigenous Rights and Environmental Justice. Environmental Ethics 20 (4):377-91.
Roy W. Perrett (1998). Indigenous Rights and Environmental Justice. Environmental Ethics 20 (4):377-391.
Anna-lydia Svalastog & Stefan Eriksson (2010). You Can Use My Name; You Don't Have to Steal My Story – a Critique of Anonymity in Indigenous Studies. Developing World Bioethics 10 (2):104-110.
Bette Jacobs, Jason Roffenbender, Jeff Collmann, Kate Cherry, LeManuel Lee Bitsói, Kim Bassett & Charles H. Evans (2010). Bridging the Divide Between Genomic Science and Indigenous Peoples. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 38 (3):684-696.
Helena Kajlich (2008). Indigenous Peoples and Genetic Population Research : Reflections on a Culturally Appropriate Model of Indigenous Participant Consent. In Barbara Ann Hocking (ed.), The Nexus of Law and Biology: New Ethical Challenges. Ashgate Pub. Company
Mark F. N. Franke (2007). Self-Determination Versus the Determination of Self: A Critical Reading of the Colonial Ethics Inherent to the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. Journal of Global Ethics 3 (3):359 – 379.
Maui L. Hudson & Khyla Russell (2009). The Treaty of Waitangi and Research Ethics in Aotearoa. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 6 (1):61-68.
A. Knight Jennifer, J. Comino Elizabeth & Lisa Jackson-Pulver Elizabeth Harris (2009). Indigenous Research: A Commitment to Walking the Talk. The Gudaga Study—an Australian Case Study. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 6 (4).
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads14 ( #246,417 of 1,792,140 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #170,928 of 1,792,140 )
How can I increase my downloads?