David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Indian Philosophy 34 (6):497-519 (2006)
The Buddhist epistemologist Dharmakīrti (fl. ca. 7th century C.E.) developed a theory of yogic perception that achieved much influence among Buddhist thinkers in India and Tibet. His theory includes an odd problem: on Dharmakīrti’s view, many of the paradigmatic objects of the adept’s meditations do not really exist. How can one cultivate a meditative perception of the nonexistent? This ontological difficulty stems from Dharmakīrti’s decision to construe the Four Noble Truths as the paradigmatic objects of yogic perception. For him, this ontological problem manifests in an epistemological corollary: “impermanence” (anityatā) and other features of the Noble Truths are conceptual, but the adept’s meditative perception of them must be nonconceptual. How can a nonconceptual cognition apprehend a conceptual object? A key aspect of Dharmakīrti’s theory of concepts provides a solution to this problem. Specifically, Dharmakīrti maintains that a concept, when taken as a mental event, can be considered a particular and thus an object of nonconceptual cognition. Taking this approach, Dharmakīrti downplays the notion that yogic perception is an encounter with real things in the world, in part because it is phenomenally akin to hallucination. Instead, what counts for Dharmakīrti—and what differentiates the adept’s realization from the madman’s hallucination—are the salvific effects induced by the meditative experience.
|Keywords||Buddhist philosophy Dharmakirti Perception Yogipratyaksṣa Contemplative epistemology Contemplative theory|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Raja Ram Dravid (2001). The Problem of Universals in Indian Philosophy. Motilal Banarsidass Publishers.
Thupten Jinpa (2002). Self, Reality and Reason in Tibetan Philosophy: Tsongkhapa's Quest for the Middle Way. Routledgecurzon.
Eli Franco (2005). On Pramā Asamuccayav Tti 6AB Again. Journal of Indian Philosophy 33 (5-6):631-633.
Eli Franco (1993). Did Dignāga Accept Four Types of Perception? Journal of Indian Philosophy 21 (3):295-299.
Jeson Woo (2003). Dharmakīrti and His Commentators on Yogipratyaksa. Journal of Indian Philosophy 31 (4):439-448.
Citations of this work BETA
John Nemec (2012). The Two Pratyabhijñā Theories of Error. Journal of Indian Philosophy 40 (2):225-257.
Jeson Woo (2009). Gradual and Sudden Enlightenment: The Attainment of Yogipratyakṣa in the Later Indian Yogācāra School. [REVIEW] Journal of Indian Philosophy 37 (2):179-188.
Yaroslav Komarovski (2012). Buddhist Contributions to the Question of (Un)Mediated Mystical Experience. Sophia 51 (1):87-115.
Artur Przybyslawski (forthcoming). Cognizable Object in Tshad Ma Rigs Gter According to Go Rams Pa. Journal of Indian Philosophy:1-35.
Jeson Woo (2014). On the Yogic Path to Enlightenment in Later Yogācāra. Journal of Indian Philosophy 42 (4):499-509.
Similar books and articles
Alex Watson (2010). Bhaṭṭa Rāmakaṇṭha's Elaboration of Self-Awareness ( Svasaṃvedana ), and How It Differs From Dharmakīrti's Exposition of the Concept. Journal of Indian Philosophy 38 (3):297-321.
Dan Arnold (2008). Buddhist Idealism, Epistemic and Otherwise: Thoughts on the Alternating Perspectives of Dharmakīrti. Sophia 47 (1):3-28.
Christian Coseru (2006). A "Restricted" Interpretation of Dharmakīrti's Philosophy. [REVIEW] H-Net Reviews in the Humanities and Social Sciences.
Fujinaga Sin (2000). Determining Which Jaina Philosopher Was the Object of Dharmakīrti's Criticisms. Philosophy East and West 50 (3):378-384.
C. S. Vyas (1991). Buddhist Theory of Perception with Special Reference to Pramāṇa Vārttika of Dharmakīrti. Navrang.
Christian Coseru (2015). Taking the Intentionality of Perception Seriously: Why Phenomenology is Inescapable. Philosophy East and West 65 (1):227-248.
Chris Mortensen (2004). Dharmakirti and Priest on Change. Philosophy East and West 54 (1):20-28.
Dan Arnold (2008). Dharmakīrti's Dualism: Critical Reflections on a Buddhist Proof of Rebirth. Philosophy Compass 3 (5):1079-1096.
Hisayasu Kobayashi (2010). Self-Awareness and Mental Perception. Journal of Indian Philosophy 38 (3):233-245.
Dharmakīrti (2000). Dharmakīrti's Pramāṇavārttika: An Annotated Translation of the Fourth Chapter (Parārthānumāna). Österreichische Akademie Der Wissenschaften.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads102 ( #40,671 of 1,911,732 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #144,933 of 1,911,732 )
How can I increase my downloads?