Graduate studies at Western
Philosophical Psychology 13 (1):123-148 (2000)
|Abstract||In his book The rediscovery of the mind John Searle claims that unconscious mental states (1) have first-person "aspectual shape", but (2) that their ontology is purely third-person. He attempts to eliminate the obvious inconsistency by arguing that the aspectual shape of unconscious mental states consists in their ability to cause conscious first-person states. However, I show that this attempted solution fails insofar as it covertly acknowledges that unconscious states lack the aspectual shape required for them to play a role in psychological explanation|
|Keywords||Mind Psychology Science Unconscious Searle, J|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Itay Shani (2007). Consciousness and the First Person. Journal of Consciousness Studies 14 (12):57-91.
Anthonie W. M. Meijers (2000). Mental Causation and Searle's Impossible Conception of Unconscious Intentionality. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 8 (2):155-170.
Eric Gillett (1996). Searle and the "Deep Unconscious". Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 3 (3):191-200.
Jeffrey Hershfield (1997). Searle's Regimen for Rediscovering the Mind. Dialogue 36 (2):361-374.
John McLoughlin (1999). Unwittingly Recapitulating Freud: Searle's Concept of a Vocabulary of the Unconscious. Ratio 12 (1):34-53.
David H. Finkelstein (1999). On the Distinction Between Conscious and Unconscious States of Mind. American Philosophical Quarterly 36 (2):79-100.
Anthonie W. M. Meijers (2000). Physical and Mental? Reply to John Searle. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 8 (2):179 – 183.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads37 ( #37,191 of 755,029 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #27,287 of 755,029 )
How can I increase my downloads?