Graduate studies at Western
Journal of Business Ethics 111 (2):157-164 (2012)
|Abstract||Executives of many publicly held firms agree to compensation packages that create immense exposure to their employer’s stock. Corporate boards, aspiring to motivate executives to make value-maximizing decisions, often tie an executive’s earnings to stock price performance through stock or option awards. However, this engenders a significant ethical dilemma for many executives who are uncomfortable with sizable, firm-specific risk and desire to reduce it through hedging activities. Recent research has shown that executive hedging has become more prevalent. In essence, managers are unwinding the acute economic incentive to act in the best interest of the owners. This appears to violate the spirit of the compensation contract and from a normative standpoint, is not how executives should act. In this article, we describe how some executives are acting in regard to this issue (descriptive ethics), how they should act (normative ethics) and how they can be helped to get from what they are doing, to what they should be doing (prescriptive ethics).|
|Keywords||Executive Compensation Managerial Hedging Ethics Business Ethics|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Ella Mae Matsumura & Jae Yong Shin (2005). Corporate Governance Reform and CEO Compensation: Intended and Unintended Consequences. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 62 (2):101 - 113.
Lois Schafer Mahoney & Linda Thorn (2006). An Examination of the Structure of Executive Compensation and Corporate Social Responsibility: A Canadian Investigation. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 69 (2):149 - 162.
Obeua S. Persons (2006). The Effects of Fraud and Lawsuit Revelation on U.S. Executive Turnover and Compensation. Journal of Business Ethics 64 (4):405 - 419.
John D. Bishop (1991). The Moral Responsibility of Corporate Executives for Disasters. Journal of Business Ethics 10 (5):377 - 383.
Terri L. Rittenburg & Sean R. Valentine (2002). Spanish and American Executives' Ethical Judgments and Intentions. Journal of Business Ethics 38 (4):291 - 306.
Kiridaran Kanagaretnam, Gerald J. Lobo & Emad Mohammad (2009). Are Stock Options Grants to Ceos of Stagnant Firms Fair and Justified? Journal of Business Ethics 90 (1):137 - 155.
B. Stevens (2004). The Ethics of the US Business Executive: A Study of Perceptions. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 54 (2):163 - 171.
Ronald E. Dulek, William H. Motes & Chadwick B. Hilton (1997). Executive Perceptions of Superior and Subordinate Information Control: Practice Versus Ethics. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 16 (11):1175-1184.
Shaker A. Zahra (1989). Executive Values and the Ethics of Company Politics: Some Preliminary Findings. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 8 (1):15 - 29.
Robert Larmer (1996). Corporate Executives: Disasters and Moral Responsibility. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 15 (7):785 - 788.
John E. Pattan (1984). The Business of Ethics and the Ethics of Business. Journal of Business Ethics 3 (1):1 - 19.
T. K. Das (2005). How Strong Are the Ethical Preferences of Senior Business Executives? Journal of Business Ethics 56 (1):69 - 80.
Jamie D. Collins, Klaus Uhlenbruck & Peter Rodriguez (2009). Why Firms Engage in Corruption: A Top Management Perspective. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 87 (1):89 - 108.
Cynthia Clark Williams & Lori Verstegen Ryan (2007). Courting Shareholders: The Ethical Implications of Altering Corporate Ownership Structures. Business Ethics Quarterly 17 (4):669-688.
Bruce Walters, Tim Hardin & James Schick (1995). Top Executive Compensation: Equity or Excess? Implications for Regaining American Competitiveness. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 14 (3):227 - 234.
Added to index2012-01-11
Total downloads6 ( #155,026 of 740,065 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,960 of 740,065 )
How can I increase my downloads?