David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Business Ethics Quarterly 17 (1):5-32 (2007)
In the recent case of Nike v. Kasky both sides argued that their standard for distinguishing commercial speech from political speechwould create the better policy for ensuring accurate and complete disclosure of social information by corporations. Using insights frominformation economics, we argue that neither standard will achieve the policy goal of optimal truthful disclosure. Instead, we argue that the appropriate standard is one of optimal truthful disclosure—balancing the value of speech against the costs of misinformation. Specifically, we argue that an SEC-sanctioned safe harbor available under a closely supervised system for social reporting will bring about optimal truthful disclosure. The scheme is intended to enhance stakeholder confidence in corporate social and political commentary, while at the same time encouraging corporations to provide accurate information in a fair playing field of public debate
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Kristen Bell DeTienne & Lee W. Lewis (2005). The Pragmatic and Ethical Barriers to Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure: The Nike Case. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 60 (4):359 - 376.
Don Mayer (2007). Kasky V. Nike and the Quarrelsome Question of Corporate Free Speech. Business Ethics Quarterly 17 (1):65-96.
William S. Laufer (2003). Social Accountability and Corporate Greenwashing. Journal of Business Ethics 43 (3):253 - 261.
Reggy Hooghiemstra (2000). Corporate Communication and Impression Management – New Perspectives Why Companies Engage in Corporate Social Reporting. Journal of Business Ethics 27 (1-2):55 - 68.
David Hess (2008). The Three Pillars of Corporate Social Reporting as New Governance Regulation. Business Ethics Quarterly 18 (4):447-482.
Vassilios P. Filios (1984). Corporate Social Responsibility and Public Accountability. Journal of Business Ethics 3 (4):305 - 314.
Sepideh Parsa & Reza Kouhy (2008). Social Reporting by Companies Listed on the Alternative Investment Market. Journal of Business Ethics 79 (3):345 - 360.
Jean-Pascal Gond & Olivier Herrbach (2006). Social Reporting as an Organisational Learning Tool? A Theoretical Framework. Journal of Business Ethics 65 (4):359 - 371.
Nicole Dando & Tracey Swift (2003). Transparency and Assurance: Minding the Credibility Gap. Journal of Business Ethics 44 (2/3):195 - 200.
Harry Hummels & Diederik Timmer (2004). Investors in Need of Social, Ethical, and Environmental Information. Journal of Business Ethics 52 (1):73-84.
Diana C. Robertson & Nigel Nicholson (1996). Expressions of Corporate Social Responsibility in U.K. Firms. Journal of Business Ethics 15 (10):1095 - 1106.
Denis Cormier, Irene M. Gordon & Michel Magnan (2004). Corporate Environmental Disclosure: Contrasting Management's Perceptions with Reality. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 49 (2):143-165.
Naomi A. Gardberg, Donald H. Schepers & Louis Lipani (2011). Antecedents of Corporate Political Finance Disclosure. Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 22:424-435.
James C. Gaa (2009). Corporate Governance and the Responsibility of the Board of Directors for Strategic Financial Reporting. Journal of Business Ethics 90 (2):179 - 197.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads6 ( #292,147 of 1,696,616 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #250,163 of 1,696,616 )
How can I increase my downloads?