Business Ethics Quarterly 8 (1):127-145 (1998)
|Abstract||A marketplace of morality (MOM) is a place where individuals act under the influence of their moral desires. A MOM produces anoutput representing the aggregate acted-upon moral preferences of its participants. Individual behavior is influenced by POPs, or passions of propriety. People implement POP preferences when they buy stock, purchase goods and services, choose jobs and so on. Firms respond by social cause marketing and other devices which encourage customers to align their social preferences with those represented by the firm. The outputs of MOM constitute an important reference point for understanding business morality. Even so, the normative status of MOM outputs must be subject to principles of universal morality. A principle of greater preponderance is offered as a means for determining when a MOM output is ethically legitimate.A theory of moral choice, based upon the concept of a MOM, may have potential for providing a unifying framework integrating moralpreferences, reasoning, behaviors and organizational contexts with broader political and economic concepts|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Craig Cox (1991). In the Company of Mom and Pop. Business Ethics 5 (1):13-13.
Duncan MacIntosh (1998). Categorically Rational Preferences and the Structure of Morality. In Peter Danielson (ed.), Modeling Rationality, Morality and Evolution; Vancouver Studies in Cognitive Science, Volume 7. Oxford.
J. McKenzie Alexander (2007). The Structural Evolution of Morality. Cambridge University Press.
Iwao Taka & Thomas W. Dunfee (1997). Japanese Moralogy as Business Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics 16 (5):507 - 519.
Doreen Tan & Robin Stanley Snell (2002). The Third Eye: Exploring Guanxi and Relational Morality in the Workplace. Journal of Business Ethics 41 (4):361 - 384.
Marcus George Singer (2002). The Ideal of a Rational Morality: Philosophical Compositions. Oxford University Press.
Michael Moehler (forthcoming). The Scope of Instrumental Morality. Philosophical Studies.
Sen Sendjaya (2005). Morality and Leadership: Examining the Ethics of Transformational Leadership. Journal of Academic Ethics 3 (1).
Tobias Gössling (2003). The Price of Morality. An Analysis of Personality, Moral Behaviour, and Social Rules in Economic Terms. Journal of Business Ethics 45 (1/2):121 - 131.
John R. Boatright (2009). Rent Seeking in a Market with Morality: Solving a Puzzle About Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics 88:541 - 552.
Paul McNamara (1996). Doing Well Enough: Toward a Logic for Common-Sense Morality. Studia Logica 57 (1):167 - 192.
Ronald A. Lindsay (2005). Slaves, Embryos, and Nonhuman Animals: Moral Status and the Limitations of Common Morality Theory. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 15 (4):323-346.
Jessy Giroux (2011). The Origin of Moral Norms: A Moderate Nativist Account. Dialogue 50 (02):281-306.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2011-01-09
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?