Graduate studies at Western
Philosophical Studies 139 (3):367-393 (2008)
|Abstract||Finding disjunctivist versions of direct realism unexplanatory, Mark Johnston [(2004). Philosophical Studies, 120, 113–183] offers a non-disjunctive version of direct realism in its place and gives a defense of this view from the problem of hallucination. I will attempt to clarify the view that he presents and then argue that, once clarified, it either does not escape the problem of hallucination or does not look much like direct realism.|
|Keywords||Direct realism Hallucination Perception|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Susanna Siegel (2006). Direct Realism and Perceptual Consciousness. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 73 (2):378-410.
Mark Johnston (2004). The Obscure Object of Hallucination. Philosophical Studies 120 (1-3):113-83.
A. D. Smith (2002). The Problem of Perception. Harvard University Press.
Michael Huemer (2001). Skepticism and the Veil of Perception. Lanham: Rowman &Amp; Littlefield.
Robert G. Hudson (2000). Perceiving Empirical Objects Directly. Erkenntnis 52 (3):357-371.
Dan D. Crawford (1982). Are There Mental Inferences in Direct Perceptions? American Philosophical Quarterly 19 (January):83-92.
Moltke S. Gram (1983). Direct Realism: A Study Of Perception. Boston: Nijhoff.
Douglas J. McDermid (2001). What is Direct Perceptual Knowledge? A Fivefold Confusion. Grazer Philosophische Studien 62 (1):1-16.
David R. Hilbert (2004). Hallucination, Sense-Data and Direct Realism. Philosophical Studies 120 (1-3):185-191.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads100 ( #7,839 of 723,130 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,087 of 723,130 )
How can I increase my downloads?