The Political Thought of John Locke: An Historical Account of the Argument of the 'Two Treatises of Government'
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
London, Cambridge U.P. (1969)
This study provides a comprehensive reinterpretation of the meaning of Locke's political thought. John Dunn restores Locke's ideas to their exact context, and so stresses the historical question of what Locke in the Two Treatises of Government was intending to claim. By adopting this approach, he reveals the predominantly theological character of all Locke's thinking about politics and provides a convincing analysis of the development of Locke's thought. In a polemical concluding section, John Dunn argues that liberal and Marxist interpretations of Locke's politics have failed to grasp his meaning. Locke emerges as not merely a contributor to the development of English constitutional thought, or as a reflector of socio-economic change in seventeenth-century England, but as essentially a Calvinist natural theologian.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$22.19 used (44% off) $43.06 direct from Amazon (7% off) $143.33 new Amazon page|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Quentin Skinner (1991). Who Are 'We'? Ambiguities of the Modern Self. Inquiry 34 (2):133 – 153.
Raymond Geuss (2012). Economies: Good, Bad, Indifferent. Inquiry 55 (4):331-360.
Paul Kelly (2010). Why Equality? On Justifying Liberal Egalitarianism. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 13 (1):55-70.
Susan Hekman (1984). Action as a Text: Gadamer's Hermeneutics and the Social Scientific Analysis of Action. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 14 (3):333–354.
Kim Sungmoon (2009). Self-Transformation and Civil Society: Lockean Vs. Confucian. Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 8 (4):383-401.
Similar books and articles
John Marshall (1994). John Locke: Resistance, Religion, and Responsibility. Cambridge University Press.
Jeffrey Friedman (1988). Locke as Politician. Critical Review 2 (2-3):64-101.
E. J. Lowe (2005). Locke. Routledge.
Ian Harris (1994). The Mind of John Locke: A Study of Political Theory in its Intellectual Setting. Cambridge University Press.
Timothy Stanton (2011). Christian Foundations; or Some Loose Stones? Toleration and the Philosophy of Locke's Politics. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 14 (3):323-347.
Graham Faiella (2006). John Locke: Champion of Modern Democracy. Rosen Pub. Group.
John Dunn (2003). Locke: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press.
David Armitage (2004). John Locke, Carolina, and the "Two Treatises of Government". Political Theory 32 (5):602-627.
Stanley Williams Moore (1970). The Political Thought of John Locke: An Historical Account of the Argument of the 'Two Treatises of Government'. Journal of the History of Philosophy 8 (3):345-347.
Added to index2009-09-15
Total downloads66 ( #25,404 of 1,140,280 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #61,130 of 1,140,280 )
How can I increase my downloads?