David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Synthese 167 (1):33 - 65 (2009)
J. H. Lambert proved important results of what we now think of as non-Euclidean geometries, and gave examples of surfaces satisfying their theorems. I use his philosophical views to explain why he did not think the certainty of Euclidean geometry was threatened by the development of what we regard as alternatives to it. Lambert holds that theories other than Euclid’s fall prey to skeptical doubt. So despite their satisfiability, for him these theories are not equal to Euclid’s in justification. Contrary to recent interpretations, then, Lambert does not conceive of mathematical justification as semantic. According to Lambert, Euclid overcomes doubt by means of postulates. Euclid’s theory thus owes its justification not to the existence of the surfaces that satisfy it, but to the postulates according to which these “models” are constructed. To understand Lambert’s view of postulates and the doubt they answer, I examine his criticism of Christian Wolff’s views. I argue that Lambert’s view reflects insight into traditional mathematical practice and has value as a foil for contemporary, model-theoretic, views of justification.
|Keywords||Epistemology of mathematics Non-Euclidean geometry History of model theory Proof by construction J. H. Lambert|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
David Hume (1739/2000). A Treatise of Human Nature. Oxford University Press.
Michael Friedman (1992). Kant and the Exact Sciences. Harvard University Press.
Paolo Mancosu (1996). Philosophy of Mathematics and Mathematical Practice in the Seventeenth Century. Oxford University Press.
Frederick Beiser (2003). German Idealism. The Struggle against Subjectivism, 1781-1801. Filosoficky Casopis 51 (449):338-344.
Lisa Shabel (2002). Mathematics in Kant's Critical Philosophy: Reflections on Mathematical Practice. Routledge.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Edward N. Zalta (1985). Lambert, Mally, and the Principle of Independence. Grazer Philosophische Studien 25:447-459.
S. Berryman (1998). Euclid and the Sceptic: A Paper on Vision, Doubt, Geometry, Light and Drunkenness. Phronesis 43 (2):176 - 196.
Sylvia Berryman (1998). Euclid and the Sceptic: A Paper on Vision, Doubt, Geometry, Light and Drunkenness. Phronesis 43 (2):176-196.
E. T. Whittaker (1949). From Euclid to Eddington: A Study of Conceptions of the External World. Ams Press.
John Mumma (2010). Proofs, Pictures, and Euclid. Synthese 175 (2):255 - 287.
Keith K. Niall (2002). Visual Imagery and Geometric Enthymeme: The Example of Euclid I. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (2):202-203.
Lambert (2009). Johann Heinrich Lambert: Treatise on the Criterion of Truth (1761) ; New Organon (1764). In Eric Watkins (ed.), Kant's Critique of Pure Reason: Background Source Materials. Cambridge University Press
Peter L. Berger (2009). In Praise of Doubt: How to Have Convictions Without Becoming a Fanatic. Harperone/Harpercollins Publishers.
Rene Jagnow (2003). Geometry and Spatial Intuition: A Genetic Approach. Dissertation, Mcgill University (Canada)
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads59 ( #76,169 of 1,934,735 )
Recent downloads (6 months)7 ( #77,119 of 1,934,735 )
How can I increase my downloads?