David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 72 (1):153–172 (1998)
[John Dupré] This paper attacks some prominent contemporary attempts to provide reductive accounts of ever wider areas of human behaviour. In particular, I shall address the claims of sociobiology (or evolutionary psychology) to provide a universal account of human nature, and attempts to subsume ever wider domains of behaviour within the scope of economics. I shall also consider some recent suggestions as to how these approaches might be integrated. Having rejected the imperialistic ambitions of these approaches, I shall briefly advocate a more pluralistic approach to the understanding of human behaviour, and one which leaves some space for the possibility of genuine human autonomy. /// [John O'Neill] One response to Dupré's criticism of rational choice theory's unifying aspirations is that it is aimed at over-ambitious versions of the theory. Immodesty about the scope of rational choice theory may look more plausible given suitable modesty in assumptions about the rational agent. The paper examines problems with one immodest version of the theory-public choice theory-and show how these shed light on problems in modest versions employing minimal assumptions about the preference structure of rational agents. However, while rational choice theory may fail in its unifying ambitions, I argue those aspirations are defensible
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Philip Pettit (2000). Rational Choice, Functional Selection and Empty Black Boxes. Journal of Economic Methodology 7 (1):33-57.
John Ferejohn (2002). Symposium on Explanations and Social Ontology 1: Rational Choice Theory and Social Explanation. Economics and Philosophy 18 (2):211-234.
John O'Neill (1998). Against Reductionist Explanations of Human Behaviour: John O'Neill. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 72 (1):173–188.
John O'Neill (1998). Against Reductionist Explanations of Human Behaviour: John O'Neill. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 72 (1):173-188.
Milan Zafirovski (2003). The Rational Choice Approach to Human Studies: A Reexamination. [REVIEW] Human Studies 26 (1):41-66.
Debra Friedman & Michael Hechter (1988). The Contribution of Rational Choice Theory to Macrosociological Research. Sociological Theory 6 (2):201-218.
Ellery Eells (1987). Probabilistic Causality: Reply to John Dupré. Philosophy of Science 54 (1):105-114.
James Bernard Murphy (1995). Rational Choice Theory as Social Physics. Critical Review 9 (1-2):155-174.
Ross Poole (1992). Living with Reason. Inquiry 35 (2):199 – 217.
John Dupré (2001). Human Nature and the Limits of Science. Oxford University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads49 ( #86,491 of 1,906,955 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #277,342 of 1,906,955 )
How can I increase my downloads?