Inside the Kunstkammer: the circulation of optical knowledge and instruments at the Dresden Court

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 40 (4):405-420 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The Kunstkammer of the Electors of Saxony, founded in Dresden around 1560, housed one of the richest collections of tools and scientific instruments in its day. A close analysis of the optical objects in the collection in the decades around 1600 is undertaken here—in particular, their arrangement by a mathematically trained curator, Lucas Brunn, and their use in an ‘experiment’ by a distinguished visitor, Johannes Kepler. It is argued that the selection, display and use of optical objects within this collection reflect a specific, playful image of optics promoted at the Saxon court.Keywords: Court collections; Optics; Instruments; Perspective; Wonder

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Reconstruction of the Optical Revolution: Lakatos vs. Laudan.Xiang Chen - 1988 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1988:103 - 109.
How is a species kept together?Peter J. Beurton - 1995 - Biology and Philosophy 10 (2):181-196.
Color as a material, not an optical, property.Bruce J. MacLennan - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (1):37-38.
Mathematics and Natural Science.Arnold Dresden - 1927 - The Monist 37 (1):120-130.
Strategies against Pornography.Gerald Keaney - 2012 - Minerva (16):36-61. Free Online.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-14

Downloads
48 (#323,919)

6 months
5 (#629,136)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Touching anatomy: On the handling of preparations in the anatomical cabinets of Frederik Ruysch.Rina Knoeff - 2015 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 49:32-44.

Add more citations