David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Perspectives on Science 16 (4):pp. 328-359 (2008)
While Newton tried to make his telescope into a proof of the supremacy of his theory of colours over older theories, his instrument was welcomed as a way to shorten telescopes, not as a way to solve the problem of chromatic aberration. This paper argues that the image published together with the report on Newton’s telescope in Philosophical Transactions (1672) encouraged this reception. The differences between this visualization and other images of Newton’s telescope, especially that published in Opticks (1704), are discussed. This paper shows that the image in Opticks adopted characteristics of a Cartesian program of visualization of machines and instruments which complemented a rhetoric which attributed primacy to theory over practice. The differences between the images in Philosophical Transactions and Opticks are also considered within the broader institutional context of Newton’s attitude towards the Royal Society.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
D. J. Bryden & D. L. Simms (1993). Spectacles Improved to Perfection and Approved of by the Royal Society. Annals of Science 50 (1):1-32.
Rob Iliffe (1992). «In the Warehouse»: Privacy, Property and Priority in the Early Royal Society. History of Science 30 (87):29-68.
Antoni Malet (1997). Isaac Barrow on the Mathematization of Nature: Theological Voluntarism and the Rise of Geometrical Optics. Journal of the History of Ideas 58 (2):265-287.
Jean-François Gauvin (2006). Artisans, Machines, and Descartes's Organon. History of Science 44 (2):187.
Zev Bechler (1975). ‘A Less Agreeable Matter’: The Disagreeable Case of Newton and Achromatic Refraction. British Journal for the History of Science 8 (2):101-126.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Steffen Ducheyne, The General Scholium: Some Notes on Newton's Published and Unpublished Endeavours.
Eric Schliesser (2011). Newton's Substance Monism, Distant Action, and the Nature of Newton's Empiricism: Discussion of H. Kochiras “Gravity and Newton's Substance Counting Problem”. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 42 (1):160-166.
Isaac Newton (2004). Philosophical Writings. Cambridge, Uk ;Cambridge University Press.
Andrew Janiak & Eric Schliesser (eds.) (2012). Interpreting Newton: Critical Essays. Cambridge University Press.
Athanassios Raftopoulos (1999). Newton's Experimental Proofs as Eliminative Reasoning. Erkenntnis 50 (1):91-121.
John Gage (2008). Signs of Disharmony: Newton's Opticks and the Artists. Perspectives on Science 16 (4):pp. 360-377.
Edward Slowik (2009). Newton's Metaphysics of Space: A “Tertium Quid” Betwixt Substantivalism and Relationism, or Merely a “God of the Gaps”? Perspectives on Science 17 (4):pp. 429-456.
Yaakov Zik (2001). Science and Instruments: The Telescope as a Scientific Instrument at the Beginning of the Seventeenth Century. Perspectives on Science 9 (3):259-284.
Alan E. Shapiro (2008). Twenty-Nine Years in the Making: Newton's Opticks. Perspectives on Science 16 (4):pp. 417-438.
Fokko Jan Dijksterhuis (2008). Reading Up on the Opticks. Refashioning Newton's Theories of Light and Colors in Eighteenth-Century Textbooks. Perspectives on Science 16 (4):pp. 309-327.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads16 ( #281,031 of 1,932,454 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #456,114 of 1,932,454 )
How can I increase my downloads?