Scientific pluralism and the plurality of the sciences: Comments on David Hull's science as a process
Philosophical Studies 60 (1-2):61 - 76 (1990)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,709 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesDavid Oldroyd (1990). David Hull's Evolutionary Model for the Progress and Process of Science. Biology and Philosophy 5 (4):473-487.
Brent D. Mishler (1990). Phylogenetic Analogies in the Conceptual Development of Science. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1990:225 - 235.
Jacquelyn Anne K. Kegley (2010). Peirce and Royce and the Betrayal of Science: Scientific Fraud and Misconduct. The Pluralist 5 (2).
John Kelsay (1996). Review: Plurality, Pluralism, and Comparative Ethics: A Review Essay. [REVIEW] Journal of Religious Ethics 24 (2):403 - 428.
Jane Maienschein (2000). ``Why Study History for Science?''. Biology and Philosophy 15 (3).
Michael Bradie (1990). The Evolution of Scientific Lineages. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1990:245 - 254.
Kim J. Vicente (2000). Is Science an Evolutionay Process? Evidence From Miscitation of the Scientific Literature. Perspectives on Science 8 (1):53-69.
Alex Rosenberg (1992). Selection and Science: Critical Notice of David Hull's Science as a Process. Biology and Philosophy 7 (2):217-228.
David L. Hull (2001). Science and Selection: Essays on Biological Evolution and the Philosophy of Science. Cambridge University Press.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads10 ( #106,476 of 549,699 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,425 of 549,699 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
