David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
AI and Society 28 (1):51-54 (2013)
In this short paper—little more than a note, even a short “contrarian” sermon for this anniversary volume—what I do is argue that even the allegedly most “revolutionary” inventions of our computer-driven age are not revolutionary in the sense that their impacts are “driving” society. Some of them are genuinely revolutionary, I admit, but in the reverse direction. The inventions don’t “impact societies”; rather, particular communities within society use the technical languages that are at their core, invent them, embed them in machines, and so on. It is not inventions but particular groups within modern—and so-called postmodern—societies that have invented and use technical languages which are embedded in gadgets that are said to “drive” modern or postmodern societies. And they do so only in one sense: they were invented and are used by various communities in our kinds of societies for a variety of ends. And if this is so, and if we feel those ends are undemocratic or positively anti-democratic, I conclude that we should resist them any way we can, even politically.
|Keywords||Information technology Postmodern society Interactionism Ethnomethodology|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Peter Berger & Thomas Luckmann (1966/1990). The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. Anchor Books.
G. H. Mead (forthcoming). Mind, Self and Society. Chicago, Il.
Langdon Winner (1997). Cyberlibertarian Myths and the Prospects for Community. Acm Sigcas Computers and Society 27 (3):14-19.
Paul T. Durbin (2010). Philosophy, Activism, and Computer and Information Specialists Revisited. AI and Society 25 (1):119-122.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Steven Best & Douglas Kellner, Dawns,Twilights, and Transitions: Postmodern Theories, Politics, and Challenges.
Douglas Kellner, Review of Albert Borgmann, Holding Onto Reality. The Nature of Information at the Turn Of. [REVIEW]
Bernard Reber & Claire Brossaud (eds.) (2009). Digital Cognitive Technologies: Epistemology and Knowledge Society. Iste Ltd.
D. Kellner (1999). Virilio, War and Technology: Some Critical Reflections. Theory, Culture and Society 16 (5-6):103-125.
H. P. P. Lotter (2007). Are ICTs Prerequisites for the Eradication of Poverty? International Review of Information Ethics 7:09.
Steve Fuller (2000). The Truth About Science in the Postmodern Condition. The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 2000:105-120.
Judith Irene Lochhead & Joseph Henry Auner (eds.) (2002). Postmodern Music/Postmodern Thought. Routledge.
Stephen Wilmot (2001). Corporate Moral Responsibility: What Can We Infer From Our Understanding of Organisations? [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 30 (2):161 - 169.
Wolfgang Hesse, Dirk Müller & Aaron Ruß (2008). Information, Information Systems, Information Society: Interpretations and Implications. Poiesis and Praxis 5 (3-4):159-183.
John Arquilla (1999). Can Information Warfare Ever Be Just? Ethics and Information Technology 1 (3):203-212.
Andrew Gustafson (2000). Making Sense of Postmodern Business Ethics. Business Ethics Quarterly 10 (3):645-658.
Tadeusz Tyszka, Piotr Zielonka, Raymond Dacey & Przemys (2008). Perception of Randomness and Predicting Uncertain Events. Thinking and Reasoning 14 (1):83 – 110.
Added to index2012-02-22
Total downloads13 ( #268,362 of 1,796,208 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #468,533 of 1,796,208 )
How can I increase my downloads?