Austin On Whether Every Proposition Has A Contradictory

Analysis 27 (April):167-170 (1967)
Abstract
Austin rejects the contention that every proposition has a contradictory. This paper finds problems with the case Austin makes for rejecting the contention in question.
Keywords Austin  proposition  contradictory
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 10,941
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Similar books and articles
Nat Hansen (2012). J. L. Austin and Literal Meaning. European Journal of Philosophy 20 (4):n/a-n/a.
Andrew Munro (2013). Reading Austin Rhetorically. Philosophy and Rhetoric 46 (1):22-43.
Charles Sayward (2001). Austin and Perception. Acta Analytica 16 (27):169-193.
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2011-01-04

Total downloads

6 ( #203,160 of 1,100,744 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

3 ( #115,309 of 1,100,744 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.