Austin On Whether Every Proposition Has A Contradictory

Analysis 27 (April):167-170 (1967)
Austin rejects the contention that every proposition has a contradictory. This paper finds problems with the case Austin makes for rejecting the contention in question.
Keywords Austin  proposition  contradictory
Categories (categorize this paper)
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 12,404
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Similar books and articles
Nat Hansen (2012). J. L. Austin and Literal Meaning. European Journal of Philosophy 20 (4):n/a-n/a.
Andrew Munro (2013). Reading Austin Rhetorically. Philosophy and Rhetoric 46 (1):22-43.
Charles Sayward (2001). Austin and Perception. Acta Analytica 16 (27):169-193.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

6 ( #218,223 of 1,140,392 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

2 ( #85,305 of 1,140,392 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.