David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Religious Ethics 37 (3):513-529 (2009)
David Hollenbach, working within the context of human rights theory, has developed the notion of "indigenous pluralism" as a means of coping with the problems that arise when different religious traditions hold distinct or incompatible interpretations of human rights. It will be argued that indigenous pluralism is a theoretically and practically useful concept for bioethics as well and hence should be incorporated into bioethical methodology and processes of bioethical policy formation. Subsequently, the notion of indigenous pluralism will be discussed in relation to determinations of death as a means of illustrating this concept's applicability to bioethical inquiry
|Keywords||brain death indigenous pluralism conscience clause human rights bioethics religious diversity|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
T. J. Bole (2000). The Person in Secular and in Orthodox-Catholic Bioethics. Christian Bioethics 6 (1):85-112.
Winston Chiong (2005). Brain Death Without Definitions. Hastings Center Report 35 (6):20-30.
Linda L. Emanuel (1995). Reexamining Death The Asymptotic Model and a Bounded Zone Definition. Hastings Center Report 25 (4):27-35.
Omar Sultan Haque (2008). Brain Death and its Entanglements. Journal of Religious Ethics 36 (1):13-36.
Father Nikolaos Hatzinikolaou (2003). Prolonging Life or Hindering Death? An Orthodox Perspective on Death, Dying and Euthanasia. Christian Bioethics 9 (2):187-201.
Citations of this work BETA
Chris Durante (2009). Republicanism in Bioethics? American Journal of Bioethics 9 (2):55 – 56.
Similar books and articles
Terry Dunbar & Margaret Scrimgeour (2006). Ethics in Indigenous Research – Connecting with Community. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 3 (3):179-185.
Fabrice Jotterand (2010). Human Dignity and Transhumanism: Do Anthro-Technological Devices Have Moral Status? American Journal of Bioethics 10 (7):45-52.
Mark F. N. Franke (2007). Self-Determination Versus the Determination of Self: A Critical Reading of the Colonial Ethics Inherent to the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. Journal of Global Ethics 3 (3):359 – 379.
Anthony J. Stenson & Tim S. Gray (1999). An Autonomy-Based Justification for Intellectual Property Rights of Indigenous Communities. Environmental Ethics 21 (2):177-190.
Tim S. Gray (1999). An Autonomy-Based Justification for Intellectual Property Rights of Indigenous Communities. Environmental Ethics 21 (2):177-190.
Megan Jane Davis, Indigenous Rights and the Constitution: Making the Case for Constitutional Reform.
Roy W. Perrett (1998). Indigenous Rights and Environmental Justice. Environmental Ethics 20 (4):377-91.
Roy W. Perrett (1998). Indigenous Rights and Environmental Justice. Environmental Ethics 20 (4):377-391.
Alasdair Cochrane (2012). Evaluating 'Bioethical Approaches' to Human Rights. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 15 (3):309 - 322.
Added to index2009-08-18
Total downloads51 ( #38,731 of 1,679,448 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #182,904 of 1,679,448 )
How can I increase my downloads?