Philosophy and Social Criticism 28 (3):321-336 (2002)
|Abstract||An attempt is made to try to delineate the common ground of feminist concerns and the work of Wittgenstein by alluding to several areas of theory - among them are the orality-literacy distinction, the notion of the universal, and the realm of particulars. I cite portions of both the Tractatus and the Investigations, and utilize the work of commentators such as Anscombe, Fogelin and Genova. The broader argument is that Wittgenstein's turn away from a kind of logical atomism is a move that can readily be used for feminist purposes, but that it requires precise articulation and a clear setting-out of conditions. Key Words: feminist theory orality-literacy particulars and the universal reference Wittgenstein's Investigations Wittgenstein's Tractatus.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Carlo Penco (2010). The Influence of Einstein on Wittgenstein's Philosophy. Philosophical Investigations 33 (4):360-379.
P. X. Monaghan (2010). A Novel Interpretation of Plato's Theory of Forms. Metaphysica 11 (1):63-78.
Danièle Moyal-Sharrock (2007). The Good Sense of Nonsense: A Reading of Wittgenstein's Tractatus as Nonself-Repudiating. Philosophy 82 (1):147-177.
H. E. Baber (1987). How Bad Is Rape? Hypatia 2 (2):125 - 138.
Lucy O'Brien, Final Version: O'Brien, L. F. (1996), 'Solipsism and Self-Reference', European Journal of Philosophy 4:175-194.
Dr David Macarthur (2010). Wittgenstein and Expressivism. In Daniel Whiting (ed.), The Later Wittgenstein on Language. Palgrave Macmillan.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads10 ( #107,683 of 556,837 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,847 of 556,837 )
How can I increase my downloads?