|Abstract||Sokal and Bricmont in their exposé of allegedly meaningless statements about science by recent French philosophers take errors of particular applications of philosophical ideas to science as refutations of the whole general framework utilized. They also seem to think that taking snippets out of context is sufficient to expose the "fashionable nonsense." In the early twentieth century, British analytic philosophers such as Bertrand Russell and A. N. Whitehead did the same with Hegel on mathematics. After deciding not to bother to read Hegel because of distaste for what he wrote about mathematics, Whitehead was later surprised to learn that his own relational process philosophy resembled that of Hegel in various respects.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||No categories specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Alan D. Sokal (1999/2003). Intellectual Impostures: Postmodern Philosophers' Abuse of Science. Profile Books.
Frederick C. Beiser (2005). Hegel. Routledge.
Colin McLarty (2008). Review of S. Duffy, Virtual Mathematics: The Logic of Difference. [REVIEW] Australasian Journal of Philosophy 86 (2):332-336.
Robert Taylor (1999). Intellectual Impostures. Philosophy Now 25:46-48.
Jean-Philippe Bouilloud (2003). The Reception of the Sokal Affair in France—"Pomo" Hunting or Intellectual Mccarthyism?: A Propos of Impostures Intellectuelles by A. Sokal and J. Bricmont. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 33 (1):122-137.
Tom Rockmore (2004). Hegel, Idealism, and Analytic Philosophy. Yale University Press.
Laurence Winant Dickey (1987). Hegel: Religion, Economics, and the Politics of Spirit, 1770-1807. Cambridge University Press.
Paul Redding (2011). The Analytic Neo-Hegelianism of John McDowell & Robert Brandom. In Stephen Houlgate & Michael Baur (eds.), A Companion to Hegel. Blackwell.
Added to index2010-12-22
Total downloads2 ( #234,650 of 556,837 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?