David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy and Social Criticism 23 (3):1-35 (1997)
This contribution is a critical and constructive engage ment with discourse ethics. First, it clarifies why discourse ethics has difficulties with the grounding and application of moral norms. Second, it turns to a positive appropriation of the formal and proce dural aspects of discourse ethics. The goal is the elaboration of an ethics that is able to incorporate the material aspects of goods and the formal dimension of ethical validity and consensuability. Every morality is the formal application of some substantive good. Every ethical perspective demands its evaluation in terms of its uni versability. In order to achieve this mediation, it is suggested that we must incorporate not only the historical dimension of moral systems, but also the role of critical consciousness and the negativity embod ied by those who are victims of the existing consensus. The essay con cludes with six points that need to be considered when formulating a material ethics that is universalizable and, most importantly, that can address the massive poverty and dehumanization of those excluded from the present community of communication. Key Words: application consensual corporeality discourse ethics formal grounding intersubjective Kantian liberation ethics material phronesis procedural validity.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Andreas Spahn (2012). And Lead Us (Not) Into Persuasion…? Persuasive Technology and the Ethics of Communication. Science and Engineering Ethics 18 (4):633-650.
V. Tahmasebi (2010). Does Levinas Justify or Transcend Liberalism? Levinas on Human Liberation. Philosophy and Social Criticism 36 (5):523-544.
James F. Childress (1977). The Identification of Ethical Principles. Journal of Religious Ethics 5 (1):39 - 66.
Michael D. Barber (1998). Ethical Hermeneutics: Rationality in Enrique Dussel's Philosophy of Liberation. Fordham University Press.
Thomas Beschorner (2006). Ethical Theory and Business Practices: The Case of Discourse Ethics. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 66 (1):127 - 139.
LaRue Tone Hosmer & Nicholas H. Steneck (1989). Teaching Business Ethics: The Use of Films and Videota. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 8 (12):929 - 936.
Harry J. Gensler (1996). Formal Ethics. Routledge.
Eduardo Medieta (1999). Ethics for an Age of Globalization and Exclusion. Philosophy and Social Criticism 25 (2).
Enrique D. Dussel (2012). Ethics of Liberation in the Age of Globalization and Exclusion. Duke University Press.
Kjetil Fretheim (2011). Development, Ethics and Theology: Interdisciplinary Connections and Challenges. Journal of Global Ethics 7 (3):303-313.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads20 ( #91,916 of 1,139,956 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #165,020 of 1,139,956 )
How can I increase my downloads?