Kant's retreat, Hugo's advance, Freud's erection; or, Derrida's displacements in his death penalty lectures
Southern Journal of Philosophy 50:107-135 (2012)
| Abstract | This article analyzes the role played by Immanuel Kant's defense of the death penalty, in the first and the second years of Jacques Derrida's Death Penalty Seminars, delivered from 1999 to 2001. Regarding the first year, the initial part of this article charts how Derrida introduces Kant's writings that purport to elaborate the categorical imperative of the death penalty, not by Kant's primary arguments but rather precisely through Kant's concession of an exception to this categorical imperative, concerning the impunity of a mother's infanticide. Derrida's lectures juxtapose Kant's philosophy of the death penalty with Victor Hugo's claim for the inviolability of life, and in doing so, the sessions introduce other examples of the applicability of the death penalty to mothers who have killed their children. What is at stake is the status of philosophy relative to the death penalty. Concerning the second year, the latter part of this article isolates the logic of Kant's categorical imperative, as deconstructed by Derrida, through recourse to the additions that Kant was obliged to append to his initial argument—those involving precisely sex crimes. The article follows how Derrida thoroughly takes apart both the simplicity of Kant's categorical imperative of the death penalty by means of the complications that are its abyssal foundation and the phallogocentrism of Freud's sexual oppositions through the extraction of insights into another thinking of sexual difference that Freud's categories foreclosed | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,653 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesKas Saghafi (2012). The Death Penalty, in Other Words, Philosophy. Southern Journal of Philosophy 50:136-142.
Michael Naas (2012). The Philosophy and Literature of the Death Penalty: Two Sides of the Same Sovereign. Southern Journal of Philosophy 50:39-55.
Marguerite la Caze (2009). Derrida: Opposing Death Penalties. Derrida Today 2 (2):186-199.
Geoffrey Bennington (2012). Rigor; or, Stupid Uselessness. Southern Journal of Philosophy 50:20-38.
Benjamin S. Yost (2011). Kant's Justification of the Death Penalty Reconsidered. Kantian Review 15 (2):1-27.
Martin McQuillan (2009). Extra Time and the Death Penalties: On a Newly Arisen Violent Tone in Philosophy. Derrida Today 2 (2):133-150.
Elizabeth Rottenberg (2012). Cruelty and its Vicissitudes: Jacques Derrida and the Future of Psychoanalysis. Southern Journal of Philosophy 50:143-159.
Peggy Kamuf (2012). Protocol: Death Penalty Addiction. Southern Journal of Philosophy 50:5-19.
Kelly Oliver (2012). See Topsy “Ride the Lightning”: The Scopic Machinery of Death. Southern Journal of Philosophy 50:74-94.
Attila Ataner (2006). Kant on Capital Punishment and Suicide. Kant-Studien 97 (4):452-482.
Matthias Fritsch (2012). Derrida on the Death Penalty. Southern Journal of Philosophy 50:56-73.
Tom Sorell (1993). Aggravated Murder and Capital Punishment. Journal of Applied Philosophy 10 (2):201-213.
Olivia Custer (2012). Angling for a Stranglehold on the Death Penalty. Southern Journal of Philosophy 50:160-173.
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2012-08-10Total downloads3 ( #201,730 of 548,984 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,327 of 548,984 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
