K modálnímu ontologickému důkazu

Studia Neoaristotelica 1 (1/2):33-69 (2004)
De argumento ontologico modaliIn haec dissertatione variae formae sic dicti „secundi seu modalis argumenti ontologici“ a nostrae auctoribus (inde a N. Malcolmio usque ad P. Tichý) propositae examinantur. Tria praecipua huius argumenti praesupposita deteguntur ac perpenduntur. Difficultatem maximam, qua argumentum omnibus in formis laboret, in existentia necessaria Deo tribuenda sitam esse demonstratur. Si enim huiusmodi existentia Deo tribueretur, nullum mundum possibilem talem existere dicendum esset, in quo Deus non adesset. Talem vero mundum possibilem non occurere falsum esse videtur.On the Modal Ontological Argument.The article deals with various modal versions of the ontological argument from N. Malcolm’s to P. Tichý’s interpretation of Anselm’s second proof. Three key presuppositions of the modal proof are pin-pointed and examined. The principal problem with the proof seems to be the notion of necessary existence attributed to God. More precisely, the question is whether this is not too strong an attribute, for then there would not be a situation, i.e. a possible world, consistently thinkable which precludes the existence of God. However, this seems to be wrong
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.5840/studneoar200411/24
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index Translate to english
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 15,914
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
James Hardy (1996). Burdens of Proof. Journal of Philosophical Research 21:321-330.
Yiftach J. H. Fehige (2009). Thought Experimenting with God. Revisiting the Ontological Argument. Neue Zeitschrift für Systematicsche Theologie Und Religionsphilosophie 51 (3):249-267.
Paul Gilbert (2009). Et hoc dicimus Deum. Giornale di Metafisica 31 (3):465 - 480.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

4 ( #405,485 of 1,725,584 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

3 ( #211,098 of 1,725,584 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.