David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Economics and Philosophy 6 (01):65- (1990)
Social scientists could learn some useful things from philosophy. Here I shall discuss what I take to be one such thing: a better understanding of the concept of utility. There are several reasons why a better understanding may be useful. First, this concept is commonly found in the writings of social scientists, especially economists (see, for example, Sen and Williams, 1982). Second, utility is the main ingredient in utilitarianism, a perspective on morality that, traditionally, has been very influential among social scientists. Third, and most important, with a better understanding of utility comes, as I shall try to show here, a better understanding of “personal welfare”. or, in other words, of what may be said to be in people's best interests. Such an understanding is useful to social scientists and philosophers alike, whether for utilitarian purposes or not.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
J. Dewey (1939). Theory of Valuation. In J. A. Boydston (ed.), The Later Works, 1925--1953. Southern Illinois University Press. 250.
Amitai Etzioni (1986). The Case for a Multiple-Utility Conception. Economics and Philosophy 2 (02):159-.
David P. Gauthier (1986). Morals by Agreement. Oxford University Press.
Geoffrey Russell Grice (1967). The Grounds of Moral Judgement. Cambridge, Cambridge U.P..
Citations of this work BETA
Joseph Mendola (2006). Intuitive Hedonism. Philosophical Studies 128 (2):441 - 477.
A. P. Taylor (2013). The Frustrating Problem For Four-Dimensionalism. Philosophical Studies 165 (3):1097-1115.
Tyler Cowen (1993). The Scope and Limits of Preference Sovereignty. Economics and Philosophy 9 (02):253-.
Similar books and articles
Judy Attfield (ed.) (1999). Utility Reassessed: The Role of Ethics in the Practice of Design. Distributed Exclusively in the Usa by St. Martin's Press.
Eckehard F. Rosenbaum (1995). Interpersonal Comparisons of Utility: Positive, Normative or Value-Laden? Journal of Economic Methodology 2 (2):239-258.
Ulrich Schmidt (2001). Lottery Dependent Utility: A Reexamination. Theory and Decision 50 (1):35-58.
Hans Lottenbach (1994). Expected Utility and Constrained Maximization: Problems of Compatibility. [REVIEW] Erkenntnis 41 (1):37 - 48.
Per-erik Malmnäs (1994). Axiomatic Justifications of the Utility Principle: A Formal Investigation. Synthese 99 (2):233 - 249.
Paul Weirich (1984). Interpersonal Utility in Principles of Social Choice. Erkenntnis 21 (3):295 - 317.
Marc le Menestrel (2001). A Process Approach to the Utility for Gambling. Theory and Decision 50 (3):249-262.
Stephen A. Clark (2000). Revealed Preference and Expected Utility. Theory and Decision 49 (2):159-174.
Wesley Cooper (2008). Decision-Value Utilitarianism. Polish Journal of Philosophy 2 (2):39-50.
Paul Weirich (2010). Utility and Framing. Synthese 176 (1):83 - 103.
Added to index2010-08-10
Total downloads38 ( #51,673 of 1,413,361 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #94,237 of 1,413,361 )
How can I increase my downloads?