David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Estetika 47 (1):71-95 (2010)
In this important article, first published in 1917, the Czech aesthetician, musicologist, and composer Otakar Zich (1879–1934) distinguishes between two kinds of evaluation of a work of art: aesthetic evaluation and artistic evaluation. He bases this differentiation on two possible attitudes that a perceiver may have towards a work of art. The first originates solely in the perceiver’s experience of the work and his or her search for a feeling of pleasure. It reflects only the subjective preferences of the individual; Zich terms the corresponding value ‘relative aesthetic value’. Above the relative value of an emotional effect there is an evaluation of a higher order, which consists in ‘comprehending’ a work of art. It is to this evaluation that artistic value corresponds. According to Zich, however, this objective value is grounded not in the work itself, but in the distinctive ‘personal value’ of the artist. In artistic evaluation, the work of art is therefore evaluated as a manifestation of strong artistic individuality. The first part of the article was published in the previous issue.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Roman Dykast (2009). Otakar Zich: Aesthetic and Artistic Evaluation, Part 1. Estetika 46 (2):179-201.
Jonathan Gilmore (2011). A Functional View of Artistic Evaluation. Philosophical Studies 155 (2):289-305.
Andrew Huddleston (2012). In Defense of Artistic Value. Philosophical Quarterly 62 (249):705-714.
James Shelley (2002). The Character and Role of Principles in the Evaluation of Art. British Journal of Aesthetics 42 (1):37-51.
Paul Crowther (2007). Defining Art, Creating the Canon: Artistic Value in an Era of Doubt. Oxford University Press.
Dustin Stokes (2014). Cognitive Penetration and the Perception of Art (Winner of 2012 Dialectica Essay Prize). Dialectica 68 (1):1-34.
Graham McFee (2005). The Artistic and the Aesthetic. British Journal of Aesthetics 45 (4):368-387.
Dominic McIver Lopes (2011). The Myth of (Non-Aesthetic) Artistic Value. Philosophical Quarterly 61 (244):518-536.
Rob van Gerwen (2004). Ethical Autonomism. The Work of Art as a Moral Agent. Contemporary Aesthetics 2.
Harold Osborne (1972). Aesthetics. London,Oxford University Press.
Samantha Matherne (2013). The Inclusive Interpretation of Kant's Aesthetic Ideas. British Journal of Aesthetics 53 (1):21-39.
Andrea Sauchelli (2012). Ethicism and Immoral Cognitivism: Gaut Versus Kieran on Art and Morality. Journal of Aesthetic Education 46 (3):107-118.
Tomáš Kulka (2009). Why Aesthetic Value Judgements Cannot Be Justified. Estetika 46 (1):3-28.
Robert Kraut (2007). Artworld Metaphysics. Oxford University Press.
Dale Jacquette (ed.) (1996). Schopenhauer, Philosophy, and the Arts. Cambridge University Press.
Added to index2011-02-21
Total downloads3 ( #620,981 of 1,907,403 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #464,819 of 1,907,403 )
How can I increase my downloads?