Acta Biotheoretica 27 (1-2) (1978)
|Abstract||The biologist's involvement in value issues concerning the methodology of biological sciences, in establishing the biological basis of ethics and in creating a value system based on biological knowledge is examined. It is proposed that the roots of this involvement are in the conflict of the knowledge-ethic with the established system of values and in the need for metaphysical explanation.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
David L. Hull & Michael Ruse (eds.) (1998). The Philosophy of Biology. Oxford University Press.
Timothy L. Fort (2004). A Deal, a Dolphin, and a Rock. The Ruffin Series of the Society for Business Ethics 2004:81-91.
Richard Levins (1985). The Dialectical Biologist. Harvard University Press.
Philippe De Backer, Danny De Waele & Linda Van Speybroeck (2010). Ins and Outs of Systems Biology Vis-à-Vis Molecular Biology: Continuation or Clear Cut? Acta Biotheoretica 58 (1).
T. Douglas & J. Savulescu (2010). Synthetic Biology and the Ethics of Knowledge. Journal of Medical Ethics.
Richard W. Burkhardt (1994). Ernst Mayr: Biologist-Historian. Biology and Philosophy 9 (3):359-371.
Jean Rostand (1973). Humanly Possible; a Biologist's Notes on the Future of Mankind. New York,Saturday Review Press.
Linda Van Speybroeck (2007). Philosophy of Biology: About the Fossilization of Disciplines and Other Embryonic Thoughts. Acta Biotheoretica 55 (1).
Holmes Rolston (1990). Biology and Philosophy in Yellowstone. Biology and Philosophy 5 (2):241-258.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads2 ( #232,501 of 549,087 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?