David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Theoria 76 (1):4-24 (2010)
An abstract mathematical theory is presented for a common variety of soritical arguments, treated here in terms of responses of a system, say, a biological organism, a gadget, or a set of normative linguistic rules, to stimuli. Any characteristic of the system's responses which supervenes on stimuli is called a stimulus effect upon the system. Classificatory sorites is about the identity of or difference between the effects of stimuli that differ 'only microscopically'. We formulate the classificatory sorites on arguably the highest possible level of generality and show that the 'paradox' is dissolved on grounds unrelated to vague predicates or other linguistic issues traditionally associated with it. If stimulus effects are properly defined (i.e., they are uniquely determined by stimuli), and if the space of the stimuli is endowed with appropriate (not necessarily metric) closeness and connectedness properties, then this space must contain points in every vicinity of which, 'however small', the stimulus effect is not constant. The effects can only be 'tolerant' to very small differences between stimuli if the closeness structure that is used to define very close stimuli does not render the space of stimuli appropriately connected: in this case the 'paradox' cannot be formulated. Nor can it be formulated if the response properties considered are not true effects, i.e., if they do not supervene on stimuli.
|Keywords||supervenience on stimuli comparison tolerant responses connectedness sorites vagueness closeness|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Timothy Williamson (2000). Knowledge and its Limits. Oxford University Press.
Timothy Williamson (1994). Vagueness. Routledge.
Roy A. Sorensen (1988). Blindspots. Oxford University Press.
Kit Fine (1975). Vagueness, Truth and Logic. Synthese 30 (3-4):265-300.
Stewart Shapiro (2006). Vagueness in Context. Oxford University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
Ehtibar N. Dzhafarov & Damir D. Dzhafarov (2010). Sorites Without Vagueness II: Comparative Sorites. Theoria 76 (1):25-53.
Similar books and articles
Susanne Bobzien (2002). Chrysippus and the Epistemic Theory of Vagueness. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 102 (1):217-238.
William W. Rozeboom (1960). Do Stimuli Elicit Behavior?--A Study in the Logical Foundations of Behavioristics. Philosophy of Science 27 (2):159-170.
Richard DeWitt (1992). Remarks on the Current Status of the Sorites Paradox. Journal of Philosophical Research 17 (1):93.
Tamás Pólya & László Tarnay (1999). Sorites Paradox and Conscious Experience. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (1):165-165.
Samuel Levey (2002). Leibniz and the Sorites. The Leibniz Review 12:25-49.
Ofra Magidor (2012). Strict Finitism and the Happy Sorites. Journal of Philosophical Logic 41 (2):471-491.
Mark Colyvan (2010). A Topological Sorites. Journal of Philosophy 107 (6):311-325.
Added to index2010-01-12
Total downloads454 ( #2,858 of 1,911,741 )
Recent downloads (6 months)135 ( #1,531 of 1,911,741 )
How can I increase my downloads?