Alan Chalmers: The scientist's atom and the philosopher's stone: how science succeeded and philosophy failed to gain knowledge of atoms

Foundations of Chemistry 13 (1):79-83 (2011)
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords Philosophy   History   Physical Chemistry   Philosophy of Science   Chemistry/Food Science, general
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10698-010-9102-9
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 15,879
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Alan Chalmers (1997). Did Democritus Ascribe Weight to Atoms? Australasian Journal of Philosophy 75 (3):279 – 287.
A. Pyle (2002). Boyle on Science and the Mechanical Philosophy: A Reply to Chalmers. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 33 (1):171-186.
Michael Polanyi (1958). Personal Knowledge. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
Milena Ivanova (2013). Did Perrin's Experiments Convert Poincare to Scientific Realism. Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 3 (1):1-19.
Manuel Bächtold (2010). Saving Mach's View on Atoms. Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 41 (1):1 - 19.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

106 ( #22,516 of 1,725,169 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #349,103 of 1,725,169 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.