David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 30 (2):185-235 (1999)
Except for a few brief periods, Einstein was uninterested in analysing the nature of the spacetime singularities that appeared in solutions to his gravitational field equations for general relativity. The existence of such monstrosities reinforced his conviction that general relativity was an incomplete theory which would be superseded by a singularity-free unified field theory. Nevertheless, on a number of occasions between 1916 and the end of his life, Einstein was forced to confront singularities. His reactions show a strange asymmetry: he tended to be more disturbed by (what today we would call) merely apparent singularities and less disturbed by (what we would call) real singularities. Einstein had strong a priori ideas about what results a correct physical theory should deliver. In the process of searching through theoretical possibilities, he tended to push aside technical problems and jump over essential difficulties. Sometimes this method of working produced brilliant new ideas-such as the Einstein-Rosen bridge-and sometimes it lead him to miss important implications of his theory of gravity-such as gravitational collapse.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
K. A. Brading & T. A. Ryckman (2008). Hilbert's 'Foundations of Physics': Gravitation and Electromagnetism Within the Axiomatic Method. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 39 (1):102-153.
Michael Tamir (2012). Proving the Principle: Taking Geodesic Dynamics Too Seriously in Einstein's Theory. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 43 (2):137-154.
J. Brian Pitts (2008). Why the Big Bang Singularity Does Not Help the Kal M Cosmological Argument for Theism. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 59 (4):675-708.
Jeroen van Dongen (2002). Einstein and the Kaluza–Klein Particle. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 33 (2):185-210.
Similar books and articles
Erik Curiel (1999). The Analysis of Singular Spacetimes. Philosophy of Science 66 (3):145.
Jonathan Bain (1998). Whitehead's Theory of Gravity. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 29 (4):547-574.
Vincent Lam (2007). The Singular Nature of Spacetime. Philosophy of Science 74 (5):712-723.
Jeroen van Dongen (2010). Einstein's Unification. Cambridge University Press.
Cristi Stoica, Interpretation of Singularities in General Relativity and the Information Loss Paradox (Version 2).
John Norton, A Conjecture on Einstein, the Independent Reality of Spacetime Coordinate Systems and the Disaster of 1913.
James Mattingly (2001). Singularities and Scalar Fields: Matter Theory and General Relativity. Proceedings of the Philosophy of Science Association 2001 (3):S395-.
D. J. (2000). `Nature is the Realisation of the Simplest Conceivable Mathematical Ideas': Einstein and the Canon of Mathematical Simplicity. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 31 (2):135-170.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads53 ( #76,236 of 1,789,829 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #315,587 of 1,789,829 )
How can I increase my downloads?