Philosophy of Science 60 (1):22-42 (1993)
|Abstract||The standard theory of computation excludes computations whose completion requires an infinite number of steps. Malament-Hogarth spacetimes admit observers whose pasts contain entire future-directed, timelike half-curves of infinite proper length. We investigate the physical properties of these spacetimes and ask whether they and other spacetimes allow the observer to know the outcome of a computation with infinitely many steps|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Christian Wüthrich, Hajnal Andréka & István Németi, A Twist in the Geometry of Rotating Black Holes: Seeking the Cause of Acausality.
P. D. Welch (2008). The Extent of Computation in Malament–Hogarth Spacetimes. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 59 (4):659-674.
Mark Hogarth (1993). Predicting the Future in Relativistic Spacetimes. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 24 (5):721-739.
John Byron Manchak (forthcoming). Is Spacetime Hole-Free? General Relativity and Gravitation.
Gábor Etesi & István Németi (2002). Non-Turing Computations Via Malament-Hogarth Space-Times. International Journal of Theoretical Physics 41:341--70.
Tim Button (2009). Hyperloops Do Not Threaten the Notion of an Effective Procedure. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 5635:68-78.
John Earman (1995). Bangs, Crunches, Whimpers, and Shrieks: Singularities and Acausalities in Relativistic Spacetimes. Oxford University Press.
John Byron Manchak (2010). On the Possibility of Supertasks in General Relativity. Foundations of Physics 40 (3):276-288.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads52 ( #23,678 of 722,698 )
Recent downloads (6 months)27 ( #4,655 of 722,698 )
How can I increase my downloads?