David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Teaching Philosophy 28 (3):249-259 (2005)
Given the inexperience, misconceptions and misgivings students often bring to a first course in philosophy, we present an activity that acquaints students with the main areas of philosophical inquiry and the tools philosophers use. Students engage in philosophical thinking by reflecting on and answering questions, defending and discussing their answers, and modifying or rejecting views in light of this discussion. The activity introduces students to conceptual analysis, argument, thought-experiment, and the use of counterexampleswhile simultaneously emphasizing and illuminating students’ natural tendency to think philosophically
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Bruce Davidson (2004). The Gospel of Critical Thinking in the Land of Harmony. Inquiry 23 (3):5-10.
Robert Garnett & Kristin Klopfenstein (2004). Critical Thinking as an Interpersonal Experience. Inquiry 23 (3):11-16.
Paul Gregory, List of Courses Taught at Washington and Lee University: Note: Each Syllabus Consists of Two Main Pages, the Home or Syllabus Page, and the Reading Schedule Which is Linked From the Home Page...
Golnaz Hashemian & Michael C. Loui (2010). Can Instruction in Engineering Ethics Change Students' Feelings About Professional Responsibility? Science and Engineering Ethics 16 (1):201-215.
James Pearson (2013). Asking Students What Philosophers Teach. Teaching Philosophy 36 (1):31-49.
Maralee Harrell (2012). Assessing the Efficacy of Argument Diagramming to Teach Critical Thinking Skills in Introduction to Philosophy. Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 27 (2):31-39.
Alan C. B. Tse & Alan K. M. Au (1997). Are New Zealand Business Students More Unethical Than Non-Business Students? Journal of Business Ethics 16 (4):445-450.
Kevin Zanelotti (2006). Taking Motivation Seriously. Teaching Philosophy 29 (3):245-253.
Patricia C. Keith-Spiegel, Barbara G. Tabachnick & Melanie Allen (1993). Ethics in Academia: Students' Vies of Professors' Actions. Ethics and Behavior 3 (2):149 – 162.
Shu Ching Yang (2012). Attitudes and Behaviors Related to Academic Dishonesty: A Survey of Taiwanese Graduate Students. Ethics and Behavior 22 (3):218 - 237.
Shelagh Crooks (2009). Teaching for Argumentative Thought. Teaching Philosophy 32 (3):247-261.
Thomas L. Carson (1988). "Who Are We to Judge?". Teaching Philosophy 11 (1):3-14.
Maralee Harrell, Using Argument Diagrams to Improve Critical Thinking Skills in 80-100 What Philosophy Is.
Kurt Mosser (2006). Looking for a Fight. Teaching Philosophy 29 (4):343-362.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads9 ( #165,403 of 1,101,646 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #91,692 of 1,101,646 )
How can I increase my downloads?