David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Foundations of Chemistry 11 (2):65-77 (2009)
In 1931 eminent chemist Fritz Paneth maintained that the modern notion of “element” is closely related to (and as “metaphysical” as) the concept of element used by the ancients (e.g., Aristotle). On that basis, the element chlorine (properly so-called) is not the elementary substance dichlorine, but rather chlorine as it is in carbon tetrachloride. The fact that pure chemicals are called “substances” in English (and closely related words are so used in other European languages) derives from philosophical compromises made by grammarians in the late Roman Empire (particularly Priscian [fl. ~520 CE]). When the main features of the constitution of isotopes became clear in the first half of the twentieth century, the formal (IUPAC) definition of a “chemical element” was changed. The features that are “essential” to being an element had previously been “transcendental” (“beyond the sphere of consciousness”) but, by the mid-twentieth century the defining characteristics of elements, as such, had come to be understood in detail. This amounts to a shift in a “horizon of invisibility” brought about by progress in chemistry and related sciences. Similarly, chemical insight is relevant to currently-open philosophical problems, such as the status of “the bundle theory” of the coherence of properties in concrete individuals.
|Keywords||Philosophy Physical Chemistry History Chemistry/Food Science, general Philosophy of Science|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
D. M. Armstrong (2004). Truth and Truthmakers. Cambridge University Press.
Markus Kohl (2008). Substancehood and Subjecthood in Aristotle's Categories. Phronesis 53 (2):152-179.
Ruth Garrett Millikan (2000). On Clear and Confused Ideas: An Essay About Substance Concepts. Cambridge University Press.
Joseph Owens (2007). Aristotle's Gradations of Being in Metaphysics E-Z. St. Augustine's Press.
David Robb (2005). Qualitative Unity and the Bundle Theory. The Monist 88 (4):466-92.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Paul A. Bogaard (2006). After Substance: How Aristotle's Question Still Bears on the Philosophy of Chemistry. Philosophy of Science 73 (5):853-863.
H. Kragh (2000). Conceptual Changes in Chemistry: The Notion of a Chemical Element, Ca. 1900-1925. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 31 (4):435-450.
Eric Scerri (2006). On the Continuity of Reference of the Elements: A Response to Hendry. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 37 (2):308-321.
Nalini Bhushan (2007). What is a Chemical Property? Synthese 155 (3):293 - 305.
Robin Findlay Hendry (2006). Elements, Compounds, and Other Chemical Kinds. Philosophy of Science 73 (5):864-875.
M. F. Sharlow (2006). Chemical Elements and the Problem of Universals. Foundations of Chemistry 8 (3):225-242.
F. A. Paneth (2003). The Epistemological Status of the Chemical Concept of Element. Foundations of Chemistry 5 (2):113-145.
Robin Findlay Hendry (2005). Lavoisier and Mendeleev on the Elements. Foundations of Chemistry 7 (1):31-48.
Eric Scerri (2003). Response to Vollmer's Review of Minds and Molecules. Philosophy of Science 70 (2):391-398.
Eric Scerri (2012). What is an Element? What is the Periodic Table? And What Does Quantum Mechanics Contribute to the Question? Foundations of Chemistry 14 (1):69-81.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads31 ( #65,277 of 1,410,463 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #75,847 of 1,410,463 )
How can I increase my downloads?