Off-campus access
Using PhilPapers from home?
Click here to configure this browser for off-campus access.
- Review author[S.]: John Earman (1993). In Defense of Laws: Reflections on Bas Van Fraassen's Laws and Symmetry. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 53 (2):413-419.
Similar books and articles
No categories
No categories
No categories
No categories
Metaphysicians speak of laws of nature in terms of necessity and universality; scientists, in terms of symmetry and invariance. In this book van Fraassen argues that no metaphysical account of laws can succeed. He analyzes and rejects the arguments that there are laws of nature, or that we must believe there are, and argues that we should disregard the idea of law as an adequate clue to science. After exploring what this means for general epistemology, the author develops the empiricist view of science as a construction of models to represent the phenomena.
No categories
Discussion of Review author[S.]: John Earman, In defense of laws: Reflections on Bas Van Fraassen's laws and symmetry
|
|
There are no threads in this forum |
Nothing in this forum yet.

