Natural Selection, Childrearing, and the Ethics of Marriage (and Divorce): Building a Case for the Neuroenhancement of Human Relationships [Book Review]
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy and Technology 25 (4):561-587 (2012)
We argue that the fragility of contemporary marriages—and the corresponding high rates of divorce—can be explained (in large part) by a three-part mismatch: between our relationship values, our evolved psychobiological natures, and our modern social, physical, and technological environment. “Love drugs” could help address this mismatch by boosting our psychobiologies while keeping our values and our environment intact. While individual couples should be free to use pharmacological interventions to sustain and improve their romantic connection, we suggest that they may have an obligation to do so as well, in certain cases. Specifically, we argue that couples with offspring may have a special responsibility to enhance their relationships for the sake of their children. We outline an evolutionarily informed research program for identifying promising biomedical enhancements of love and commitment.
|Keywords||neuroenhancement love drugs marriage default natural ethics evolution values|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Jerome Barkow, Leda Cosmides & John Tooby (eds.) (1992). The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture. Oxford University Press.
Helen E. Fisher (1998). Lust, Attraction, and Attachment in Mammalian Reproduction. Human Nature 9 (1):23-52.
Jonathan Gottschall & Marcus Nordlund (2006). Romantic Love: A Literary Universal? Philosophy and Literature 30 (2):450-470.
Citations of this work BETA
Brian D. Earp, Olga A. Wudarczyk, Anders Sandberg & Julian Savulescu (2013). If I Could Just Stop Loving You: Anti-Love Biotechnology and the Ethics of a Chemical Breakup. American Journal of Bioethics 13 (11):3-17.
Patricia Marino (2014). Philosophy of Sex. Philosophy Compass 9 (1):22-32.
Neil McArthur (2013). The Heart Outright: A Comment on “If I Could Just Stop Loving You”. American Journal of Bioethics 13 (11):24-25.
Similar books and articles
Julian Savulescu & Anders Sandberg (2008). Neuroenhancement of Love and Marriage: The Chemicals Between Us. [REVIEW] Neuroethics 1 (1):31-44.
David Sanderlin (1993). Charity According to St. John of the Cross: A Disinterested Love for Interesting Special Relationships, Including Marriage. Journal of Religious Ethics 21 (1):87 - 115.
Pauline Kleingeld (1998). Just Love? Marriage and the Question of Justice. Social Theory and Practice 24 (2):261-281.
Lara Denis (2001). From Friendship to Marriage: Revising Kant. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 63 (1):1-28.
Frederic Gilbert & Bernard Baertschi (2011). Neuroenhancement: Much Ado About Nothing? American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 2 (4):45-47.
Joshua D. Goldstein (2011). New Natural Law Theory and the Grounds of Marriage. Social Theory and Practice 37 (3):461-482.
Timothy F. Murphy (2011). Same-Sex Marriage: Not a Threat to Marriage or Children. Journal of Social Philosophy 42 (3):288-304.
Don S. Browning (2011). A Natural Law Theory of Marriage. Zygon 46 (3):733-760.
Christopher Arroyo (2011). Same-Sex Marriage, 'Homosexual Desire,' and the Capacity to Love. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 25 (2):171-186.
Elizabeth Brake (2010). Minimal Marriage: What Political Liberalism Implies for Marriage Law. Ethics 120 (2):302-337.
Iddo Landau (2004). An Argument for Marriage. Philosophy 79 (3):475-481.
Added to index2012-07-05
Total downloads143 ( #9,166 of 1,696,562 )
Recent downloads (6 months)24 ( #19,412 of 1,696,562 )
How can I increase my downloads?