Philosophy of Science 34 (3):211-222 (1967)
|Abstract||This paper presents a critical examination of claims advanced by several philosophers to the effect that 'time travel' represents a physical possibility and that the interpretation of certain actually observed phenomena in terms of 'time travel' is both legitimate and advantageous. It is argued that (a) no convincing motivation for the introduction of the time travel hypothesis has been presented; (b) no coherent and interesting sense of 'going backward in time' has been supplied which makes 'time travel' compatible with Special Relativity; (c) even the conceptual possibility of 'time travel' is an unsettled and somewhat nebulous question|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Chris Smeenk & Christian Wuthrich (2011). Time Travel and Time Machines. In Craig Callender (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Time. Oxford University Press.
Manolo Martínez (2011). Travelling in Branching Time. Disputatio 4 (31):59-75.
Kurt Stocker (2012). The Time Machine in Our Mind. Cognitive Science 36 (3):385-420.
Steven D. Hales (2010). No Time Travel for Presentists. Logos and Episteme 1 (2):353-360.
Nicholas J. J. Smith (1997). Bananas Enough for Time Travel? British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 48 (3):363-389.
Phil Dowe (2000). The Case for Time Travel. Philosophy 75 (3):441-451.
William Grey (1999). Troubles with Time Travel. Philosophy 74 (1):55-70.
Douglas Kutach (2013). Time Travel and Time Machines. In Adrian Bardon & Heather Dyke (eds.), A Companion to the Philosophy of Time. Blackwell.
Nick Smith (2005). Why Would Time Travelers Try to Kill Their Younger Selves? The Monist 88 (3):388-395.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads60 ( #15,931 of 549,013 )
Recent downloads (6 months)12 ( #5,394 of 549,013 )
How can I increase my downloads?