David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 34 (4):559-577 (2003)
The cosmological constant is back. Several lines of evidence point to the conclusion that either there is a positive cosmological constant or else the universe is filled with a strange form of matter (“quintessence”) that mimics some of the effects of a positive lambda. This paper investigates the implications of the former possibility. Two senses in which the cosmological constant can be a constant are distinguished: the capital Λ sense in which lambda is a universal constant on a par with the charge of the electron, and the lower case λ sense in which lambda is a humble constant of integration. The latter interpretation has been touted as the means to a solution to various problems in physics. These claims are critically examined with an eye to discerning the implications for philosophy of science and foundations of physics.
|Keywords||Philosophy of physics|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
John Earman (2002). Gauge Matters. Proceedings of the Philosophy of Science Association 2002 (3):S209--20.
Christopher A. Martin (2002). Gauge Principles, Gauge Arguments and the Logic of Nature. Proceedings of the Philosophy of Science Association 2002 (3):S221-S234.
Gordon Belot (2003). Symmetry and Gauge Freedom. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 34 (2):189-225.
John D. Norton (1993). General Covariance and the Foundations of General Relativity: Eight Decades of Dispute. Reports of Progress in Physics 56:791--861.
Katherine Bracing & Harvey R. Brown (2003). Symmetries and Noether's Theorems. In Katherine A. Brading & Elena Castellani (eds.), Symmetries in Physics: Philosophical Reflections. Cambridge University Press 89.
Citations of this work BETA
Elay Shech (2015). Scientific Misrepresentation and Guides to Ontology: The Need for Representational Code and Contents. Synthese 192 (11):3463-3485.
J. Brian Pitts (2006). Absolute Objects and Counterexamples: Jones–Geroch Dust, Torretti Constant Curvature, Tetrad-Spinor, and Scalar Density. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 37 (2):347-371.
Similar books and articles
E. S. & H. Zinkernagel (2002). The Quantum Vacuum and the Cosmological Constant Problem. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 33 (4):663-705.
Svend E. Rugh & Henrik Zinkernagel (2002). The Quantum Vacuum and the Cosmological Constant Problem. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 33 (4):663-705.
Michael A. Sherbon (2012). Wolfgang Pauli and the Fine-Structure Constant. Journal of Science 2 (3):148-154.
David J. Baker (2005). Spacetime Substantivalism and Einstein's Cosmological Constant. Philosophy of Science 72 (5):1299-1311.
Quentin Smith (1994). Did the Big Bang Have a Cause? British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 45 (2):649-668.
Paul Davies, The Implications of a Cosmological Information Bound for Complexity, Quantum Information and the Nature of Physical Law.
Henrik Zinkernagel (2002). Cosmology, Particles, and the Unity of Science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 33 (3):493-516.
Christopher Ray (1990). The Cosmological Constant: Einstein's Greatest Mistake? Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 21 (4):589-604.
Charles Curry (1992). The Naturalness of the Cosmological Constant in the General Theory of Relativity: A Response to Ray. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 23 (4):657-660.
Added to index2010-09-01
Total downloads164 ( #22,941 of 1,911,604 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #457,720 of 1,911,604 )
How can I increase my downloads?