David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal for Communication and Culture 2 (1):4-19 (2012)
In English, as in many other languages, male-gendered pronouns are sometimes used to refer not only to men, but to individuals whose gender is unknown or unspecified, to human beings in general (as in ―mankind‖) and sometimes even to females (as when the casual ―Hey guys‖ is spoken to a group of women). These so-called he/man or masculine generics have come under fire in recent decades for being sexist, even archaic, and positively harmful to women and girls; and advocates of gender-neutral (or nonsexist) language have put forward serious efforts to discourage their use. Have they been successful, and to what extent? In this paper, I review some of the main arguments in favor of abolishing sexist male generics. I then present three studies tracking the use of he/man terminology in academic, popular, and personal discourse over the past several decades. I show that the use of these terms has fallen dramatically in recent years, while nonsexist alternatives have gradually taken their place. We may be paying witness to the early stages of the ultimate extinction of masculine generics.
|Keywords||masculine generics gender sexist language pronouns discourse|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Sarah‐Jane Leslie (2015). “Hillary Clinton is the Only Man in the Obama Administration”: Dual Character Concepts, Generics, and Gender. Analytic Philosophy 56 (2):111-141.
Robin Turner, "Male Logic" and "Women's Intuition" The Split in Our Thinking Between "Masculine" and "Feminine" is Probably as Old as Language Itself. Human Beings Seem..
Ariel Cohen (2004). Existential Generics. Linguistics and Philosophy 27 (2):137-168.
Sarah-Jane Leslie (2012). Generics. In Gillian Russell & Delia Fara (eds.), Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Language. Routledge
Sangeet Khemlani, Sarah-Jane Leslie & Sam Glucksberg (2012). Inferences About Members of Kinds: The Generics Hypothesis. Language and Cognitive Processes 27:887-900.
Sarah-Jane Leslie (2013). Generics Oversimplified. Noûs 47 (3):28-54.
Sarah-Jane Leslie, Generics. Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Amanda Brandone, Andrei Cimpian, Sarah-Jane Leslie & Susan Gelman (2012). Do Lions Have Manes? For Children, Generics Are About Kinds, Not Quantities. Child Development 83:423-433.
Sarah-Jane Leslie (2012). Generics Articulate Default Generalizations. Recherches Linguistiques de Vincennes 41:25-45.
Added to index2012-06-13
Total downloads173 ( #18,766 of 1,790,229 )
Recent downloads (6 months)41 ( #20,485 of 1,790,229 )
How can I increase my downloads?