Vivarium 45 (s 2-3):136-152 (2007)
|Abstract||Clashes between bits of non-homogeneous theories inherited from antiquity were an important factor in the formation of medieval theories in logic and grammar, but the traditional categories of Aristotelianism, Stoicism and Neoplatonism are not quite adequate to describe the situation. Neoplatonism is almost irrelevant in logic and grammar, while there might be reasons to introduce a new category, LAS = Late Ancient Standard, with two branches: (1) logical LAS = Aristotle + Boethius, and (2) grammatical LAS = Stoics &c. → Apollonius → Priscian.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Pierre Swiggers & Alfons Wouters (eds.) (2002). Grammatical Theory and Philosophy of Language in Antiquity. Peeters.
Stéphane Demri & Hans De Nivelle (2005). Deciding Regular Grammar Logics with Converse Through First-Order Logic. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 14 (3).
John Inglis (ed.) (2003). Medieval Philosophy and the Classical Tradition in Islam, Judaism, and Christianity. Routledgecurzon.
Taki Suto (2012). Boethius on Mind, Grammar, and Logic: A Study of Boethius' Commentaries on Peri Hermeneias. Brill.
Alex Oliver (1999). A Few More Remarks on Logical Form. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 99 (3):247–272.
Mary Louise Gill & Pierre Pellegrin (eds.) (2006). A Companion to Ancient Philosophy. Blackwell Pub..
Edward Grant (2010). The Nature of Natural Philosophy in the Late Middle Ages. Catholic University of America Press.
B. H. Slater (1974). Logic and Grammar. Philosophical Quarterly 24 (95):122-131.
G. Aldo Antonelli (2004). Logic. In Luciano Floridi (ed.), The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Computing and Information. Blackwell.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads22 ( #56,280 of 551,007 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?