David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Synthese 163 (3):433 - 442 (2008)
We consider the problems arising from using sequences of experiments to discover the causal structure among a set of variables, none of whom are known ahead of time to be an “outcome”. In particular, we present various approaches to resolve conflicts in the experimental results arising from sampling variability in the experiments. We provide a sufficient condition that allows for pooling of data from experiments with different joint distributions over the variables. Satisfaction of the condition allows for an independence test with greater sample size that may resolve some of the conflicts in the experimental results. The pooling condition has its own problems, but should—due to its generality—be informative to techniques for meta-analysis.
|Keywords||Causal discovery Search Aggregating independence tests Experimental design|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Judea Pearl (2000). Causality: Models, Reasoning, and Inference. Cambridge University Press.
Judea Pearl (2009). Causality. Cambridge University Press.
Peter Spirtes, Clark Glymour & Richard Scheines (1996). Causation, Prediction, and Search. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 47 (1):113-123.
Frederick Eberhardt, Clark Glymour & Richard Scheines, N-1 Experiments Suffice to Determine the Causal Relations Among N Variables.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Christian Elsholtz & Christian List (2005). A Simple Proof of Sen's Possibility Theorem on Majority Decisions. Elemente der Mathematik 60:45-56.
Carl Wagner (2011). Peer Disagreement and Independence Preservation. Erkenntnis 74 (2):277-288.
David H. Sanford (1976). The Direction of Causation and the Direction of Conditionship. Journal of Philosophy 73 (8):193-207.
Rögnvaldur Ingthorsson (2008). The Logical Vs. The Ontological Understanding of Conditions. Metaphysica 9 (2):129-137.
Yuval Steinitz (2001). The Logical Paradox of Causation. Journal of Philosophical Research 26:223-227.
G. William Moore, Grover M. Hutchins & Robert E. Miller (1986). A New Paradigm for Hypothesis Testing in Medicine, with Examination of the Neyman Pearson Condition. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 7 (3).
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads18 ( #193,990 of 1,789,985 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #318,432 of 1,789,985 )
How can I increase my downloads?