Hempel and Oppenheim on explanation

Philosophy of Science 28 (4):418-428 (1961)
Hempel and Oppenheim, in their paper 'The Logic of Explanation', have offered an analysis of the notion of scientific explanation. The present paper advances considerations in the light of which their analysis seems inadequate. In particular, several theorems are proved with roughly the following content: between almost any theory and almost any singular sentence, certain relations of explainability hold
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 9,357
External links
  • Through your library Configure
    References found in this work BETA

    No references found.

    Citations of this work BETA
    C. A. Hooker (1980). Explanation, Generality and Understanding. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 58 (3):284 – 290.
    Charles G. Morgan (1976). Tuomela on Deductive Explanation. Journal of Philosophical Logic 5 (4):511 - 525.
    Ren-Zong Qiu (1989). Models of Explanation and Explanation in Medicine. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 3 (2):199 – 212.
    Peter Clark (1990). Explanation in Physics: Explanation in Physical Theory. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 27:155-175.
    Similar books and articles

    Monthly downloads

    Added to index


    Total downloads

    26 ( #56,514 of 1,088,403 )

    Recent downloads (6 months)

    2 ( #42,750 of 1,088,403 )

    How can I increase my downloads?

    My notes
    Sign in to use this feature

    Start a new thread
    There  are no threads in this forum
    Nothing in this forum yet.