David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy and Theology 8 (1):41-61 (1993)
Mark Lloyd Taylor in God is Love: A Study in the Theology of Karl Rahner charges that Rahner’s understanding of the essential immutability of God renders his theology incoherent. For Taylor, Rahner’s assertion of God’s essential immutability prevents him from cartying through in a consistent manner the methodological turn to the subject which is at the heart of his theological project. An assessment of the validity of Taylor’s process-informed critique requires a careful examination of Rahner’s understanding of analogy. Analogy, for Rahner is not based on a conceptual or semantic distinction but on the ontological constitution of human transcendence. From Rahner’s perspective, Taylor’s critique is faulty because it springs from an impoverished view of Being and a diminished sense of the radical nature of human transcendence. While Taylor’s critique does not undermine Rahner’s position, it alerts one to the propensity of his position to generate substantialized interpretations and, at times, Rahner’s own tendency to dissolve too quickly dialectical tensions within his position
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Theresa Sanders (1994). Rest for the Restless? Philosophy and Theology 8 (4):347-362.
Mary V. Maher (1992). Rahner on the Human Experience of God. Philosophy and Theology 7 (2):127-164.
Denis Edwards (2006). Resurrection of the Body and Transformation of the Universe in the Theology of Karl Rahner. Philosophy and Theology 18 (2):357-383.
Peter C. Phan (1995). Is Karl Rahner's Doctrine of Sin Orthodox? Philosophy and Theology 9 (1/2):223-236.
Peter Joseph Fritz (2011). “I Am, of Course, No Prophet”. Philosophy and Theology 23 (2):317-332.
Geffrey B. Kelly (1995). “Unconscious Christianity” And The “Anonymous Christian” in The Theology of Dietrich Bonhoeffer And Karl Rahner. Philosophy and Theology 9 (1/2):117-149.
Richard Lennan (2005). Faith in Context: Rahner on the Possibility of Belief. Philosophy and Theology 17 (1/2):233-258.
Robert E. Doud (1993). Matter and God in Rahner and Whitehead. Philosophy and Theology 8 (1):63-81.
Terrence W. Tilley (2005). What Kind of Faith is Possible in Our Contexts? Philosophy and Theology 17 (1-2):259-277.
Richard Lennan (2000). Rahner's Theology of the Priesthood and the Development of Doctrine. Philosophy and Theology 12 (1):155-185.
Terrence W. Tilley (2005). What Kind of Faith is Possible in Our Contexts?: Or “Don't Talk of Love. Show Me. Show Me. . . . Show Me Now.” Responses Reflecting on Richard Lennan, “Faith in Context: Rahner on the Possibility of Belief ”. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Theology 17 (1/2):259-277.
Nicholas Adams (2000). The Present Made Future. Faith and Philosophy 17 (2):191-211.
Oliver Putz (2005). Evolutionary Biology in the Theology of Karl Rahner. Philosophy and Theology 17 (1/2):85-105.
Jessica M. Murdoch (2010). Overcoming the Foundationalist/Nonfoundationalist Divide. Philosophy and Theology 22 (1/2):373-387.
Mark Joseph T. Calano (2008). Rahnerian Freedom. Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 20:51-68.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads3 ( #284,134 of 1,096,822 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #273,068 of 1,096,822 )
How can I increase my downloads?